That seems to be the case. As it produced less downforce they would be terrible in the corners and slower overall. I also think the exhaust blowing effect has something to do with it. Looking at the Red Bull, Lotus and now Williams with their ramp exhaust it is obvious the Mercedes and Renault engines produces different blowing effects and as we all know that the Mercedes consumes more fuel they could be pumping large volumes of exhaust gases for even more downforce, thus this wing which gives even more straight line speed...MercAMGF1Fans wrote:Does running with less wing mean that they've got better mechanical grip on the W04?
There's defo a hole in front of the rear tyres!stefan_ wrote:Barcelona (Test 3, Session 2) - Day 3 (02.03.2013)
High rezolution: Sidepod inlet/bargeboard | Front wing/nosecone | Back end/exhaust
That's no hole – that's a slot.diego.liv wrote:There's defo a hole in front of the rear tyres!stefan_ wrote:Barcelona (Test 3, Session 2) - Day 3 (02.03.2013)
High rezolution: Sidepod inlet/bargeboard | Front wing/nosecone | Back end/exhaust
But why? They used it "covered", there wasn't the hole before; in this way, the air would go between the track and the tyre, isn't it?beelsebob wrote:That's no hole – that's a slot.diego.liv wrote:There's defo a hole in front of the rear tyres!stefan_ wrote:Barcelona (Test 3, Session 2) - Day 3 (02.03.2013)
High rezolution: Sidepod inlet/bargeboard | Front wing/nosecone | Back end/exhaust
Slots there are typically to help stop tyre squirt causing pressure buildup in unwanted places.diego.liv wrote:But why? They used it "covered", there wasn't the hole before; in this way, the air would go between the track and the tyre, isn't it?
Thanks! I read now that's similar to RBR solutionbeelsebob wrote:Slots there are typically to help stop tyre squirt causing pressure buildup in unwanted places.diego.liv wrote:But why? They used it "covered", there wasn't the hole before; in this way, the air would go between the track and the tyre, isn't it?
Now that is interesting.kooleracer wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula-one/21625676
Really interresting interview. Sort off hinting that the W04 is better than the MP4-27.
Since he said a while back the car lacks down force compared to the 27, (although we don't know if that has been improved recently) I wonder if the mechanical grip and suspension is more forgiving than Macca's which was always stiff?kooleracer wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula-one/21625676
Really interresting interview. Sort off hinting that the W04 is better than the MP4-27.