2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

turbof1 wrote:I have picked that up somewhere; can't remember were though.
Well, it's wrong. The layout, as far as I've seen (and I've seen full laps), is identical. There are some ways in which Barcelona can be faster in winter testing, but they're not layout. For reference, Merc have also gone 2 seconds a lap faster than they went, and 1.5 seconds a lap faster than anyone went during last year's testing.

mix2mix
mix2mix
5
Joined: 23 Feb 2012, 11:19

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

turbof1 wrote:They are not running the same track layout. Comparing the test times to the qualifying times is very fruitless. I do believe they can dive under 1:20:0 in qualy mode on supersofts.
we will see tommorow if they can, Hamilton made this lap before noon, and this is not qualy simulation. First time was 5-6 lap run, when he made 1.20.8 on medium, and next time 1.20.5 on soft, but we dont know how many laps this stint will be long, because of red flag

tbeeornottbee
tbeeornottbee
0
Joined: 08 Feb 2013, 23:34

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

Personally I feel the biggest question is not are Red Bull sandbagging/where do Merc rank compared to the others, but rather have Mercedes got on top of their tyre deg/overheating issues?
Gary Anderson writes today on the BBC website;
When watching out on the track, most cars look good if they are on new tyres and especially good on low fuel, and then deteriorate as the tyres go past their best. But the Mercedes never looks very different whatever conditions it is running in.
I haven't had the opportunity to go through their lap by lap times, but if we take what Gary said to be true (granted that may be very hard for many people here to do :? ) this would be a huge step forward for Merc

AMuS wrote an article a while back saying that Merc had actually found 1.5seconds over the winter and were looking for another 1.5 to catch up with Red Bull/McLaren/Ferrari
To me it looks like the W04 is almost there, and if it can widen the operating window of its tyres, then they should have a good chance at mixing it up on the sharp end

packman
packman
0
Joined: 04 Feb 2013, 22:41

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

Lewis: The most important thing is that single lap pace can be easily achieved

NIco: Tyre degradation is not a problem

Jenson: I would say one team that has been consistently quick and consistent in their runs is Mercedes more than anyone else.

Vettel : Do something i can't caught him......... silver :arrow: ....

Anon123
Anon123
1
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 20:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

beelsebob wrote:
turbof1 wrote:I have picked that up somewhere; can't remember were though.
Well, it's wrong. The layout, as far as I've seen (and I've seen full laps), is identical. There are some ways in which Barcelona can be faster in winter testing, but they're not layout. For reference, Merc have also gone 2 seconds a lap faster than they went, and 1.5 seconds a lap faster than anyone went during last year's testing.
Weren't Merc running the EBD in testing then? I'm not sure but I think someone here said that.

hendrix
hendrix
0
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 09:30

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

From autosport live:
"15:21 Massa's first two sectors were green, third one yellow as the tyres went away"
The tyres went away or Massa stop pushing?

User avatar
NathanOlder
48
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 10:05
Location: Kent

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

Still not purple though :mrgreen:
GoLandoGo
Lewis v2.0
King George has arrived.

New found love for GT racing with Assetto Corsa Competizione on PS5 & PC

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

Anon123 wrote:
beelsebob wrote:
turbof1 wrote:I have picked that up somewhere; can't remember were though.
Well, it's wrong. The layout, as far as I've seen (and I've seen full laps), is identical. There are some ways in which Barcelona can be faster in winter testing, but they're not layout. For reference, Merc have also gone 2 seconds a lap faster than they went, and 1.5 seconds a lap faster than anyone went during last year's testing.
Weren't Merc running the EBD in testing then? I'm not sure but I think someone here said that.
Huh? How on earth would they run an EBD? Their exhaust exits are visible on the top of the car...

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

tbeeornottbee wrote:Personally I feel the biggest question is not are Red Bull sandbagging/where do Merc rank compared to the others, but rather have Mercedes got on top of their tyre deg/overheating issues?
Gary Anderson writes today on the BBC website;
When watching out on the track, most cars look good if they are on new tyres and especially good on low fuel, and then deteriorate as the tyres go past their best. But the Mercedes never looks very different whatever conditions it is running in.
I haven't had the opportunity to go through their lap by lap times, but if we take what Gary said to be true (granted that may be very hard for many people here to do :? ) this would be a huge step forward for Merc
What Gary is describing isn't that the tyres aren't degrading, it's that the car is remaining balanced and docile even as the tyres degrade. This probably means it has a relatively large operating window already, that the front and rear tyres are degrading at a similar rate, and that the setup of the car seems to be forgiving.

I have a feeling that the W04 is of similar relative pace as the 2008 BMW. That car wasn't the out and out quickest, but it was always somewhere there in the mix just clocking up the points each race, at least until they stopped developing it.

Darknight
Darknight
0
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 09:21
Location: Bahrain

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

Was talking about Flowviz with a friend and he mentioned to me that some teams use invisible to sight Flowviz that can only be seen under ultraviolet light. Any truth to this?

CultofF1
CultofF1
0
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 08:53

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

http://formulaoneanalysis.blogspot.co.u ... posts.html

I've found some interesting adjusted times for yesterday's testing. Quite surprising that Hamilton managed a sub 1:20 :shock:

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W04

Post

Neno wrote:
LilDEF1 wrote: And that means what exactly? They'll be forever fast? Anyway I'm not talking about any particular team, I mean thing do change from time to time. I guess most people were worried Mercedes were gonna perform poorly this year as last year. I remember on AutoSPORT Live last year they always pointed how bad the car was with their tires. There was massive degradation, even though they were initially fast. This time at least they don't seem any worse compared to the Red Bulls and Mac. I guess that's what got most people hopeful. There is nothing wrong with that for sure.. I mean really now
Dont be like that, every once when regulations change one team become top dog, it was ferrari, then renault, now red bull and this going sometime until regulations change again, and new team become top dog. It's not something you should worry about, Mercedes will NEVER win championship in this regulation era they were too far last season to win championship this year, also 3 more teams are better then them and beat them directly in devolopment area last year.
Most of us this is hard to reckognize, but this is absolute truth. And please never compare Red Bull to Mercedes, it's like you comparing 3-dimensional team with 2 dimensional. Not even Hamilton can make that progress, he couldnt do it even in Mclaren.
This is ridiculous. This team is completely changed from Honda. With the amount of big league talent they've brought in, there's no reason they couldn't be possibly quicker than Red Bull. Newey isn't infallible and Merc's new strength in depth could reasonably best him. BTW I'm a Ferrari guy, not some overzealous Merc fanboy just dreaming.

Edit: I'm not claiming Merc is faster but merely pointing out that its ridiculous to act as if its impossible.
Last edited by Pierce89 on 03 Mar 2013, 09:12, edited 1 time in total.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

Weather prediction for today (03.03.2013)
Image

Day 4 line-up:

Red Bull Racing
Sebastian Vettel

Scuderia Ferrari
Fernando Alonso

McLaren
Jenson Button

Lotus F1 Team
Kimi Räikkönen/Romain Grosjean

Mercedes AMG F1 Team
Nico Rosberg

Sauber F1 Team
Nico Hülkenberg

Force India F1 Team
Paul di Resta

Williams F1 Team
Morning: Pastor Maldonado
Afternoon: Valtteri Bottas

Scuderia Toro Rosso
Daniel Ricciardo

Caterham F1 Team
Charles Pic

Marussia F1 Team
Morning: Jules Bianchi
Afternoon: Max Chilton

Running time:
9am - 1pm and 2pm - 5pm
(Local time, GMT +1)
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

CultofF1
CultofF1
0
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 08:53

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

I'm really looking forward to today. I wonder if any of the top teams will show more of their hand.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: 2013 Testing - Barcelona 2: 28 Feb - 3 Mar

Post

Ferraripilot wrote:
bhallg2k wrote:Shame they don't publish weights.


Yes and no. Merc ran with a light load, that much was obvious. It was certainly enough for Lewis to bang a 1:20 and then do 7 more laps. I'd say a starting load of around 15-20kg?

It's possible someone will crack a 1:19 tomorrow for the simple benefit of keeping everyone curious.
Without published weights, nothing is even remotely obvious, yanno? It's all grasping at straws and trying to decipher a code of intentions, weight, tire use, weather conditions, public statements, and media prognostication so we can then make our own little decisions about how we want to address personal optimism and/or pessimism for the coming year.

In other words, we know little, but want much.