I think they are joking about the very hard part.dougskullery wrote:A source at Red Bull has told me that they're pushing very hard to get Kimi on board for 2014, in the expectation that Webber will retire at the end of this year. Hmm...
I think that Red Bull have a pretty good chance to create a superior car again. I do not believe that the the three engine makers will be very different in performance and engine efficiency which is the same. The differences will probably be in the reliability of the complete power train. Whoever does the best integration of engine, electronic controls, turbo, MGUH and MGUK with the best control strategy and reliability will conserve his chance for a championship. But much of the performance game will still be played in the chassis design. And that is the same for everyone. Newey is always particularly good at conceptualising and getting new rule packages right. I trust him to come up with a superior solution for 2014 as well. I do not believe that Red Bull necessarily will suffer from not having the power train in the same company. They have done their own KERS and do understand something of the strategies that are required to optimize packaging and the integration for a quick car.Nando wrote:Maybe Red Bull feels that their era will end soon and having two top drivers in the team will minimize the collateral damage as they can compensate for not having the quickest machine.
I think with Webber it´s different. He´s enjoyed having the fastest car for near 3,5 years and he´s got zero titles.WhiteBlue wrote:You simply do not walk away from a winning car as an F1 driver. They never do.
2012 mclaren was faster on all but a few races. If not mclaren, then other cars were.Nando wrote:I think with Webber it´s different. He´s enjoyed having the fastest car for near 3,5 years and he´s got zero titles.WhiteBlue wrote:You simply do not walk away from a winning car as an F1 driver. They never do.
He´s if i´m not mistaken the oldest guy on the grid as well. He will probably never win a title with Sebastian in the other car,
Maybe Porsche and Le Mans sounds a bit more attractive then playing second fiddle once again.
The key with having the fastest car is also that it actually finishes the race.Juzh wrote:2012 mclaren was faster on all but a few races. If not mclaren, then other cars were.
Sounds exactly like RB6. Was fastest, but fragile as a house of cards.Nando wrote:The key with having the fastest car is also that it actually finishes the race.Juzh wrote:2012 mclaren was faster on all but a few races. If not mclaren, then other cars were.
It was extremely unreliable in many of the occasions where they needed it the most.
Let's not confuse best with fastest here. Fastest is fastest. ie, laptime - of which I'd agree McLaren was 2012-fastest.Nando wrote:The key with having the fastest car is also that it actually finishes the race.Juzh wrote:2012 mclaren was faster on all but a few races. If not mclaren, then other cars were.
It was extremely unreliable in many of the occasions where they needed it the most.
I think it would be close, Kimi has stepped it up this year.ced381 wrote:I hope Kimi goes to RBR next season. I really want to see a better driver then Webber against Vettel in the same car. I really wonder who would come up on top!