thisisatest wrote:For actual circumferential wear, there seems to be an easier way. just compare the wheel speeds with the GPS actual speeds to determine the tire diameter. you could run some fancy algorithm to factor in corner load, downforce, tire growth at speed, if you really wanted to. or you could just look for the relative changes.
as far as degradation "wear", I agree with Tom. just look at the lap times and listen to the screaming driver.
Except that a roll out measurement vs a actual diameter(for wheel speed) on an unloaded race pressured tire are two different numbers. On the race track, running at speed (depending on the speed), you will get a third number. It can change due to rise in pressure, deflation,the track surface, and hills, dips etc. Third, a wheel speed sensor has a phenom called "Jigger" caused by several issues) While the GPS nets a reliable speed number and comparing that to wheel speed (with the above in mind) a very small wear measurement would be undetectable as the influence of the tire speed issues are far greater in size. IMHO
"Driving a car as fast as possible (in a race) is all about maintaining the highest possible acceleration level in the appropriate direction." Peter Wright,Techical Director, Team Lotus