bonjon1979 wrote:
Sorry, I think you misunderstood. The lotus is definitely fast. What I meant was that if they were trying to do one stop then the pace they'd have to run to conserve the tyres wouldn't be fast enough to beat the 2-3 stoppers. Remember this is Barcelona, it's really hard on tyres. I expect they may try to do a 2 stop to other teams 3 but 1 stop isn't going to happen.
Leaving 1 stop aside
, I wouldn't be so sure about 2 stops for Lotus as compared to 3 stops by the others. The question is why they went for those strategies in Bahrain. Logically it should have been the other way round.
With Grosjean, I'm not sure, but I thought they were going for two stops. Two longer stints on hards and one on mediums. Then debris and forced early pitstop changed it to heavily compromised three-stopper.
With Raikonnen, I'm not sure either, but I wonder if they changed it after lost positions to Perez/Button. Alonso/Vettel situation might have played its part. They were basically racing DiResta and Vettel was out of reach. Considering RG's pace on a 3 stopper which under normal circumstances would have been even better it looked like a faster strategy. Available tyres played its part, of course, so maybe it was planned.
Also I remember Allison saying after Malaysia that three stoppers cost them some time to the best cars there. I think it is all about qualifying + position after couple of laps + who they are racing. They can always play with their tyre wear advantage by changing length of stints on hards/mediums vs track position. Barcelona 2013 might be different of course.