What manufacturing method would you use?
And how would they differ in a batch and continuous process? (making 100 vs 100K)
I would assume that something that looks like cast steel would be (cast) ductile iron, possibly under another name or trade nameGreg Locock wrote:I have seen cast steel used where appropraite as well,
I doubt anything metal will match the strength, fatigue life and weight of MIG welded CroMo tubes put together by a good fabricator.
You think a stamping tool of the size of a wishbone is low cost?tathan wrote:For making 100k I'd get sheet steel, stamp two and spot weld them together with the ball joints in. Cheap, stiff, low tooling cost.
For low batches, just make them by hand out of tubes.
Define "unacceptably heavy." In a production environment, how important is component weight versus component cost?tathan wrote:i didn't even consider casting a wishbone, i'd either forge aluminium or press steel because both will give consistent strength, unlike a die cast part which if you're making thousands you can't realistically inspect internally and you will get occasional ones breaking, unless you overspec it so much that you end up with a unacceptably heavy part.
You can use special laser cutters for profiling the ends of round tubes. Presumably cheaper than a 5-axis mill, but can only be used for doing tubes. But why do you need a 5 axis mill for that anyways? I think it could be done on a cnc lathe...marcush. wrote:Looking at the bicycle frame market it seems entirely feasible to do a TIG welded Tube job as well ..anyone seen a fully automated TIG welding job ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zvynjK4s2g
The welding may all done in less than 2 Minutes ,add to this some 2 or three minutes of automated tube cutting and end finishing and you are in a jewellike finish endproduct at very low actual production cost .
You got a investment of a 5axis CNC mill to perform the end finishing and the welding robot ain´t cheap either ...but this would open the possibility to