Just saw the Porsche Supercup race and it is sunny, completely different than what we had yesterday in qualifying.Websta wrote:More importantly, what is the weather like in Monaco?
Just saw the Porsche Supercup race and it is sunny, completely different than what we had yesterday in qualifying.Websta wrote:More importantly, what is the weather like in Monaco?
Of course, we rarely get clear picture in F1, sample of races and circumstances played its part in this particular rivalry. I think it's more a case of L.H. being worried about his reputation than anything else and if Rosberg was 0,05 slower and Hamilton 0,05 faster yesterday we wouldn't be hearing about any "struggles" and we wouldn't be having this discussion.Websta wrote:When Webber took 3 straight poles (and what looked to be three straight victories) from Catalunya to Turkey in 2010, people also got a bit caught up in the whole thing, thinking that he had now gotten the measure of Vettel. Whilst it was a very impressive stretch of form, Web didn't sustain it throughout the whole season.
All I am saying is let the whole season play out first before you say one driver is a better qualifier than the other. Definitely praise Rosberg for three consecutive poles, but a sample size of six qualifying sessions isn't enough to determine which Merc driver is the better qualifier.
More importantly, what is the weather like in Monaco?
Sorry but it´s Q3 that counts. Not FP´s or Q2´s...LionKing wrote:At Australia, Rosberg was noticably faster than Hamilton in the dry but ended up half a second slower in damp conditions in Q3. Same situation in Malaysia, Rosberg ended up 8 tenths slower in Q3.
These are the dry qualifyings so far:
China: Lewis -0.377
Bahrain: Rosberg: -0.432
Spain: Rosberg -0.254
Monaco: Rosberg -0.091
At China Rosberg was also half a second quicker in FP1 and FP2. He had hydraulics issue in FP3 and couldn't do his qualy simulation. I would say Rosberg has the measure of Lewis in dry conditions so far.
Also 3 poles in a row is something Lewis hasn't been able to achieve in his whole career yet despite usually driving best or second best cars
Shame you had to write this.iotar__ wrote:No worries, Brawn's Ferrari buddy Jean Todt will help them like he did with illegal DDRS.
Nothing really much, they just tested with "permission" of FIA new tires from Canada. In time when all testing in season are forbidden and when one team from those test getting advantage from others as they devolop new suspension just for those tests. But nothing much really...SiLo wrote:What's this about Mercedes and tyres tests?
EDIT**
Just found the BBC article about it.
On Sky Lauda said that one other team than Mercedes had already done a similar test with Pirelli. After that Brundle said the rumour is that was Ferrari after Bahrain.korzeniow wrote:Except that they tested with current car. No other team had this privilage!
Now Pirelli will build the tyres up to Merc tyre usage specification.... That's huge advantage
That´s not really true. You make it sound like Mercedes asked Pirelli to do some tests when in reality it was the other way around.rkn wrote:Merc still can't accept that all other teams have managed to make cars that suit the tyres, so they had to have their own 1000km test, which is completely unfair.
I still wonder that, specialy when you see Toto Wolf negotiating with Hembrey in Spain, as Hembrey sweating under his pants. It could easly be that Wolf asked Pirelli to ask them officaly to be that team to test, but Mercedes betrayed that deal and brought 2013 car instead 2010. In this i can see why this test was in secret not publicSectorOne wrote:That´s not really true. You make it sound like Mercedes asked Pirelli to do some tests when in reality it was the other way around.rkn wrote:Merc still can't accept that all other teams have managed to make cars that suit the tyres, so they had to have their own 1000km test, which is completely unfair.
Pirelli asked Mercedes.