It's amazing that you could tolerate it up to the post race conference. I turned the tv off after that extraordinary "over the top" overtaking move by the "Race crasher" Grosjean. The race was the pinnacle of bore-fest.Kiril Varbanov wrote:Totally unhappy about the race - it had more crashes than overtakes. That pretty much sums it up + the bored reaction of Mark Webber on the post-race conference.
I was expecting Webber and Hamilton to make contact, those 2 have history in the past, where Webber would rather make contact, than lose the place to an overtake.SectorOne wrote:Watch and learn Perez. Not all you can win but my god Webber and Hamilton are professionals.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H73kgM-EaQ[/youtube]
Also quite interesting contradiction here... Toto saying Hamilton mysteriously was off pace in last sector.
Hamilton saying he was told to hold a 6 second gap. And Brawn saying double-stops you can almost do one after another, no need for a 6 second gap basically.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ad7v5J10Klg[/youtube]
banibhusan wrote:It's amazing that you could tolerate it up to the post race conference. I turned the tv off after that extraordinary "over the top" overtaking move by the "Race crasher" Grosjean. The race was the pinnacle of bore-fest.Kiril Varbanov wrote:Totally unhappy about the race - it had more crashes than overtakes. That pretty much sums it up + the bored reaction of Mark Webber on the post-race conference.
Like hell they are, watch and learn Singapore 2010:SectorOne wrote:Watch and learn Perez. Not all you can win but my god Webber and Hamilton are professionals.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H73kgM-EaQ
Compared to all of their overtakes in their careers this is like a fart in space..iotar__ wrote:Like hell they are, watch and learn Singapore 2010:SectorOne wrote:Watch and learn Perez. Not all you can win but my god Webber and Hamilton are professionals.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H73kgM-EaQ
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxynNbw9WO4[/youtube]
OT: I wouldn't mind seeing something like that. I would say go so far as to make cars similar to 1967 in regards to being bound by mechanical grip only, with the necessary safety features. Or, if not, have the cars without front/rear wings (like Riccardo, post-Chilton).OppositeLock wrote:Perhaps F1 should take a page from other sports and have the Monaco GP as a classic event with modern versions of classic 1950's type racing chassis.
I did the commentary for the local national TV, so I had to be there, plus simultaneously translating the conference - that was the only reason to stay until the lights went away.banibhusan wrote:It's amazing that you could tolerate it up to the post race conference. I turned the tv off after that extraordinary "over the top" overtaking move by the "Race crasher" Grosjean. The race was the pinnacle of bore-fest.Kiril Varbanov wrote:Totally unhappy about the race - it had more crashes than overtakes. That pretty much sums it up + the bored reaction of Mark Webber on the post-race conference.
+1GrizzleBoy wrote:They deserve to be treated like racing drivers in a race, and that's exactly how they were treated.
Screw status.
Win your points or shut the hell up imo.
The fact of the matter is that Kimi was the only person who didn't defend Perez's attack in a way which didn't ruin anybody's race. Kimi lost points because he wanted to give Sergio the squeeze. I've seen so many people saying "he was taking the racing line." Kimi was nowhere near the racing line.
Both cars went for the space, neither backed out when they could, and both cars paid for it. Simple as that.
I'm also kind of tired of the Kimi stroking. He can say all kinds of crap on the podium like his curses couldn't melt butter, and he gets treated like a kid who just said something "adorable".
That Kimi just says the darndest things =D>
Imagine the backlash a person like Hamilton or Maldonado would get if they turned potty mouth with a mic in their hand, talked to their engineers like he were trash and threatened violence towards other people.
Furthermore, if Grosjean was sitting in that Lotus when it ended up squeezing another car into the barrier (especially when regs state that if a front wing is far enough up your car, that you need to leave space), there would be a million people questioning his "spatial awareness" and had he got up and said the things Kimi said, he'd be on a skewer.
Screw that. I have nothing against Kimi, but Monaco is a sham of a race and Perez was one of the only reasons it could be called a race that day.
Yes Perez ended up not finishing, but he did it at least trying to race at a track where most would just give up and I respect him for that at least.
Sorry to pull this back but there seems to have been something brushed over. All this talk of "alongside" etc, however as I have highlighted in bold this regulation does not seem to apply once they have entered a braking area, and actually the first bit about being on a straight supports this as well. So from my understanding, whether he was alongside or not is moot as it was already well into the braking zone. Regardless though, there still needs to be ample respect and space left for safe and clean racing. I won't go any further than that to condone or condemn either driver as it is clearly an exercise in futility, I just think that is a quite important and interesting part of the regulation that needs to be considered.beelsebob wrote: To clarify the other relevant regulation here:20.4 Any driver defending his position on a straight, and before any braking area, may use the full width of the track during his first move, provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his. Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason.
For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a ‘significant portion’.