Honestly, I don't think it's a full second, providing that in Friday sessions your results are not optimal anyway, meaning you add some more on the final setup for Q from the Friday data as well.marcush. wrote:quite funny how teams invest millions to devlop their cars -but uemi can find awhole second in the simulator by pounding around 400 times...
PR madness at its best....
Which kind of backs up what Marko was saying about the Merc test, and surely nothing beats on-track testing.marcush. wrote:quite funny how teams invest millions to devlop their cars -but uemi can find awhole second in the simulator by pounding around 400 times...
PR madness at its best....
"When we test for three days, we go a second faster - that's what Adrian Newey [Red Bull's Technical Director] says. It definitely helped them - you can see that they had no tyre problems. That's no accident."
"When we test for three days, we go a second faster - that's what Adrian Newey [Red Bull's Technical Director] says. It definitely helped them - you can see that they had no tyre problems. That's no accident.
Not really, no. It asserts that drivers get used to a track if they drive 400 laps of it. That's no new knowledge.Cam wrote:Which kind of backs up what Marko was saying about the Merc test, and surely nothing beats on-track testing.marcush. wrote:quite funny how teams invest millions to devlop their cars -but uemi can find awhole second in the simulator by pounding around 400 times...
PR madness at its best...."When we test for three days, we go a second faster - that's what Adrian Newey [Red Bull's Technical Director] says. It definitely helped them - you can see that they had no tyre problems. That's no accident."
Ironically he was on Pirellisradosav wrote:He really doesn't know much about tyres, does he?