Very well said WB!!!WhiteBlue wrote:Everything in these engines will move towards higher efficiency closer to the conditions in diesel engines. Compression will probably be very high (>10) as I expect almost complete compression (-5°TDC) before injection. Combustion should be spray guided with centrally positioned and outward opening nozzles and very lean - probably close to stoichiometric or even with air surplus. They will certainly use new and innovative injection systems with very high pressure (500 bar) that isn't used anywhere else in motor sport yet. LMP1 will probably use similar technologies in 2014. My money is on a new piezo system by Bosch also with a new pump and potentially an exotic pump principle. They could be using even more than 500 bar (1000 bar) by now and we would not know it, because the agreement for a regulation update could have come through by directive and be unpublished. I would not be surprised to see very efficient axial exhaust turbines. Nothing is too expensive as long as it is allowed. They are allowed one single stage turbine. Generally we may expect another update of the regulations on the FiA web site any time now and I would not be surprised to see significant changes to important items that are handled with great restriction until now like variable valves or nozzles. We have a precedent when we look at the regulation changes that occurred between June 2012 and December 2012. They were massive. I reckon something similar has happened in the last six months.
they leave such high tech stuff to the big guys in LMP1 :pxpensive wrote:The incentives for efficiency is obvious thanks to the flow-limit, right WB ? , but I feel they should have given more room for engine developments such as cylinder-bore and orientation, valve train and timing/duration, that would have been xciting.
An interesting point, never thought about it, even if the losses are minimal if unloaded.ringo wrote:What would be interesting is if the alternator was elimiated, since there are various batteries and motors on the car.
This would remove the parasitic load of the alternator.
900 is not really something from reliable sources as we have already said. But 800 is more than likely in 2014 IMO.ringo wrote:Well nothing ground breaking in terms of increasing thermal efficiency. Most of tech mentioned is for partial load conditions.
As for 900hp, under full load, i don't think the engine will be anywhere near 35% efficiency, or near that power level in the first place, this is from calculation.
didn't they at one point have one for training, one for qualifying and one for race?djos wrote:I miss the days of 1 engine and 1 gearbox per race weekend!
Yeah there were no real limits to how many you could use but the 1 per weekend rule was sensible IMO and didn't penalize drivers for mechanical failures for the next race.langwadt wrote:didn't they at one point have one for training, one for qualifying and one for race?djos wrote:I miss the days of 1 engine and 1 gearbox per race weekend!
not much sleep for the mechanics
I get your point, but it is kinda cool how reliable the new engines will be with similar power to the 1988 turbo engines, except now the same engine could potentially run a whole Le Mans race.djos wrote:I miss the days of 1 engine and 1 gearbox per race weekend!
Errr the Turbo's I was watching in the 80's had 1000-1500HP in Qually trim and 800-900HP in the Race, the new ones will be 800'ish HP all the time from what we know - sure the reliability will be impressive but 80's Turbo's really sorted the men from the boys imo.Cold Fussion wrote:I get your point, but it is kinda cool how reliable the new engines will be with similar power to the 1988 turbo engines, except now the same engine could potentially run a whole Le Mans race.djos wrote:I miss the days of 1 engine and 1 gearbox per race weekend!