car without driver on track!!!!Joie de vivre wrote:Well there was no need for SC.
Still makes it a bad decision, someone in the control room didn't keep his head cool and made a right assesment.WhiteBlue wrote:car without driver on track!!!!Joie de vivre wrote:Well there was no need for SC.
only for 3 seconds!!!!!!!WhiteBlue wrote:car without driver on track!!!!Joie de vivre wrote:Well there was no need for SC.
Who? Bianchi? AFAIK F1 cars don't have a parking brake.Joie de vivre wrote:LOLOLOLOL what a RETARD!!!!
More than that they get penalised if they don't put the car in neutral so that it can be pushed away.piast9 wrote:Who? Bianchi? AFAIK F1 cars don't have a parking brake.Joie de vivre wrote:LOLOLOLOL what a RETARD!!!!
Does neutral in a F1 car mean that it kinda brakes? because else shouldn't a gear be better than neutral if you want to have it stay in place?myurr wrote:More than that they get penalised if they don't put the car in neutral so that it can be pushed away.piast9 wrote:Who? Bianchi? AFAIK F1 cars don't have a parking brake.Joie de vivre wrote:LOLOLOLOL what a RETARD!!!!
Why?WhiteBlue wrote:Alonso lucky
By definition the car needs to be free to move so that the marshalls can push it out of the way. A fire marshall was at the car before it rolled away, that guy should have stopped the car from rolling away rather than just leaving it.kaller wrote:Does neutral in a F1 car mean that it kinda brakes? because else shouldn't a gear be better than neutral if you want to have it stay in place?