Holm86 wrote:
Technical Regulations for 2014 :
5.10.5 Any device, system or procedure the purpose and/or effect of which is to increase the flow rate after the measurement point is prohibited.
if they have in hand about 1.5 cc at around 10500 for about 1 sec, then 'spend' it around 11500/12200
they can have constant AFR and constant boost over the normal rev range
this tiny amount of 'accumulation' will not be apparent
it will not be in breach of the above rule, when there is no evidence of rule breaking there is no rule breaking
the meter would appear to be +- .25% accurate under the relatively steady and benign conditions at the tank outlet
in the 6 individual injectors the fuel density can change by eg 0%-7% at these pressures and flow will be extremely discontinuous
the fuel temperature, viscosity and density will vary
the meter is measuring time-averaged section-averaged velocities and calculating an assumed accumulated mass flow rate
IMO Gills own figures seem to suggest that the metering could only detect an accumulation significantly larger than above
the data stream from the 6 'injector telltale' meters is unlikely ever to 'exactly' agree with the 'master' tank outflow data ?
get real, the engine people knew this all along, the rulemakers expect this
the measurement of unsteady fluid massflow is one of the most difficult and intractable measurement tasks (I should know)
the Gill meter is neither a unique device, nor a miracle device
if it was, such meters would not be available to F1,
they would be secretly, exclusively and very lucratively supplied to selected makers of liquid-fueled rockets
sincerely, IMO
...... other opinions are available, especially from Mr WhiteBlue
(for once I shall not respond to his inevitable counterblast)