dren wrote:The sensor is monitoring what is sent to the injectors...it could be a long way to the injectors, as x has pointed out.
Yep, its a long way. The easiest way is to mandate the size and material used for the line from the sensor to the injector(s) but as I see it there currently is nothing in the regs covering this.
rjsa wrote:To my knowledge the only way to measure mass flow is multiplying volume flow by density. Is my knowledge obsolete?
The Gill fuel flow sensor is an ultrasonic unit (as I am sure most know) that according to specs, is capable of measuring flow rate from 0.5ml/min to 6500ml/min in real time, including a bi-directional fuel flow situations with an accuracy of 0.3%.
As per Racecer Engineering article, the sensor sends an ultrasonic wave across a tube of a known diameter. If there is zero flow the time taken for the wave to travel from one end to the other will be the reference time. However when there is flow, in either direction, there will be a timing difference and this difference changes with the flow rate. So, if you add temperature correction and the known properties of the fuel then you can accurately measure the flow.
So yep, you will need to know the specifics of the fuel and adjust for temperature.
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction