Good spot. If I am correct, Ferrari came up with that solution back in 2011 (and have keep using it ever since). Up until now I never got to know the benefit of it. Does somebody know?RicerDude wrote:The front wing pillars are mounted further back on the front wing regulated section.
Dont know who came up with it. But as i remeber McLaren did the same thing back when flexiwings was the hottest. Moving the pivot point further backwards made it possible to achive higher AoA when flexing.turbof1 wrote:Good spot. If I am correct, Ferrari came up with that solution back in 2011 (and have keep using it ever since). Up until now I never got to know the benefit of it. Does somebody know?RicerDude wrote:The front wing pillars are mounted further back on the front wing regulated section.
Yes, that was back in 2011 in Valencia. Charley subsequently told McLaren they couldn't use that in the following races.Holm86 wrote:Dont know who came up with it. But as i remeber McLaren did the same thing back when flexiwings was the hottest. Moving the pivot point further backwards made it possible to achive higher AoA when flexing.turbof1 wrote:Good spot. If I am correct, Ferrari came up with that solution back in 2011 (and have keep using it ever since). Up until now I never got to know the benefit of it. Does somebody know?RicerDude wrote:The front wing pillars are mounted further back on the front wing regulated section.
Corea!Holm86 wrote:Dont know who came up with it. But as i remeber McLaren did the same thing back when flexiwings was the hottest. Moving the pivot point further backwards made it possible to achive higher AoA when flexing.turbof1 wrote:Good spot. If I am correct, Ferrari came up with that solution back in 2011 (and have keep using it ever since). Up until now I never got to know the benefit of it. Does somebody know?RicerDude wrote:The front wing pillars are mounted further back on the front wing regulated section.
Google can't translate this properly... wrote:Sulla carta il grande vantaggio dovrebbe essere dato dal fatto che grazie a questo tunnel si crea una depressione intorno alla ruota e, quindi, si possono realizzare delle prese dei freni minuscole, tali da non sporcare i flussi che generano il carico nel retrotreno. E' interessante anche il becco che si nota nella parte inferiore della "presa" in carbonio con il piccolo deviatore di flusso: quella è la zona nevralgica per creare la "minigonna termica" utile all'assetto Rake.
He says that the tunnel between the brakes should create a depression around the wheel, so in this way the team can use very small brake ducts, and have more clean airflow around the floor.techF1LES wrote:http://www.omnicorse.it/img/articoli/ev ... ziona_.jpg
Anyone who can speak Italian? Piola points to some clever solution of rear brake ducts/brake fairing which promised great advantage in simulations and wind tunnel, but failed to deliver on track. Source.
Google can't translate this properly... wrote:Sulla carta il grande vantaggio dovrebbe essere dato dal fatto che grazie a questo tunnel si crea una depressione intorno alla ruota e, quindi, si possono realizzare delle prese dei freni minuscole, tali da non sporcare i flussi che generano il carico nel retrotreno. E' interessante anche il becco che si nota nella parte inferiore della "presa" in carbonio con il piccolo deviatore di flusso: quella è la zona nevralgica per creare la "minigonna termica" utile all'assetto Rake.