But the tyres were or still are asymmetrical, so they were not made to be switched around, which is a big factor, but as i said in my post Pirelli knew bout the switching, cambers etc etc and should have acted sooner.PhillipM wrote:Whether they were or not is irrelevant, it didn't actually make any difference with that anyway, Paul was blaming it on the inner shoulder being weaker, but it turns out the teams were just swapping the entire wheel from left to right, so the outer/inner shouldsers were still in the right place.
So who felt the need to downvote this? It's a 100% true, opinion free fact.Juzh wrote:Nope. Mclaren stated on multiple occasions they followed every recommendation set by pirreli regarding camber, pressures and alignment. Segio's tires still went pop. Your argument is invalid.spinmastermic wrote: The tyres failed because they were miss-used. Under-pressured and on the wrong sides of the car. All the cars with failures in the British GP did this.
Torque will increase at the flywheel, but last I checked, tyres are not connected to the flywheel. Is torque going to increase at the wheels/tyres? I'd wager not.Dyanxx wrote:What's going to happen when they actually test the new cars with the increased torque?
Well, actually we don't know anything about the incident. The tyre also could have been damaged by debris on track or a mistake by Rosberg on the preceding lap, perhaps on a curb or off-track. It doesn't necessarily has to do something with torque. All we know is that the tyre blew at high speed on a straight. Thats not much info for a proper investigation imo.Dyanxx wrote:I find it bizarre that there is already a blowout with the 2014 tyres, while still using the current seasons cars.
Ummmm.....so torque at the wheel is independent of torque at the flywheel? That is a novel engineering principle. Was not previously aware of that. Thanks for sharing.Torque will increase at the flywheel, but last I checked, tyres are not connected to the flywheel. Is torque going to increase at the wheels/tyres? I'd wager not.
How long have you worked for Pirelli now, sir?The tyre also could have been damaged by debris on track or a mistake by Rosberg on the preceding lap, perhaps on a curb or off-track.
I´m pretty sure Pirelli or Mercedes would not worry about the extra torque if it won´t translate out to the tires.andylaurence wrote:Torque will increase at the flywheel, but last I checked, tyres are not connected to the flywheel. Is torque going to increase at the wheels/tyres? I'd wager not.Dyanxx wrote:What's going to happen when they actually test the new cars with the increased torque?
I would like to sell you one of these:MOWOG wrote:Ummmm.....so torque at the wheel is independent of torque at the flywheel? That is a novel engineering principle. Was not previously aware of that. Thanks for sharing.Torque will increase at the flywheel, but last I checked, tyres are not connected to the flywheel. Is torque going to increase at the wheels/tyres? I'd wager not.
With lower rev limit and different torque curve, gearing will certainly be changed. If horsepower is at least comparable to 2013, I'd agree that the torque delivered to the tires will ultimately be pretty similar due to gearing changes.MOWOG wrote:Let's see if I can state my case more clearly. Barring changes in the transmission, if the torque at the flywheel increases, torque where the rubber meets the road - literally and figuratively - will increase accordingly. Are you saying that is not a true statement?
Would all the electrical stuff have an effect? The torque delivery is certainly different from a conventional ICE. I guess it wouldn't be a huge effect, since it ends up being about the same power anyways, and if you don't use the electric motors in the traction limited regime it probably wouldn't matter much if at all.Jersey Tom wrote:With a different torque curve the duty cycle on the tires will be slightly different I'm sure, but I can't imagine dramatically so. I don't think the engine change will be testing the tires' durability.