2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

kooleracer wrote:But with only 33sec of e-power usage during a lap. Will we see record drop in lap times on tracks like Spa, Monza, etc, because of the lack of e-power the cover the entire lap? And is it fair to say that on those tracks the best ICE engine will be revealed because sometime during the lap the would be relying on that alone especially during quali. Because from the La Source tot Les combes is 25sec flat out. And Stavelot till the Bustop chicane is also 25 sec flatout. So 50 sec flat out where you can only use 33sec of E-power and thats excluding other parts of the track. Any solutions the counter that problem without a considerable drop of lap time?
Energy recovered from the MGU-H can be directly used by the MGU-K without an energy use restriction. So that if the engines can recover 100hp (75kW) in such situations only 60hp (45kW) need come from the energy store. With 2MJ storage that would equate to 45s running.

User avatar
Abarth
45
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 19:47

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Will be interesting how this will evolve.

Methinks it will get into a simulator battle before each GP, for driver training which power unit map should be used in which situation / race phase and track position.

The longer I think about the more I believe a constructor team has not only a huge advantage wrt influencing packaging etc. but also because they have all means in house to simulate properly the engine behaviour in the simulator.
AFAIK there are teams which do not even have simulator. They'll have a hard time I guess, at least at the beginning.

Software / programming contest...

kooleracer
kooleracer
24
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 16:07

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

wuzak wrote:
kooleracer wrote:But with only 33sec of e-power usage during a lap. Will we see record drop in lap times on tracks like Spa, Monza, etc, because of the lack of e-power the cover the entire lap? And is it fair to say that on those tracks the best ICE engine will be revealed because sometime during the lap the would be relying on that alone especially during quali. Because from the La Source tot Les combes is 25sec flat out. And Stavelot till the Bustop chicane is also 25 sec flatout. So 50 sec flat out where you can only use 33sec of E-power and thats excluding other parts of the track. Any solutions the counter that problem without a considerable drop of lap time?
Energy recovered from the MGU-H can be directly used by the MGU-K without an energy use restriction. So that if the engines can recover 100hp (75kW) in such situations only 60hp (45kW) need come from the energy store. With 2MJ storage that would equate to 45s running.
On Monza you a still short a considerable amount of the max HP that is available for the entire lap. Monza is 76% full throttle. Pole lap was 83 seconds, 76% is 63 sec. so that is a big hole to fill 45-63= 18sec. That can only mean that the lap time will considerably drop. Also Monza and Spa always required more fuel then tracks like Monaco.
Irvine:"If you don't have a good car you can't win it, unless you are Michael or Senna. Lots of guys won in Adrian Newey's cars, big deal. Adrian is the real genius out there, there is Senna, there is Michael and there is Newey.They were the three great talents."

michl420
michl420
20
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

On tracks like Spa or Monza with long straights the engine and also the mguh is long and stady on hight revs. The harvest from the mguh could be useful for laptimes. Fuel consumption will be the bigger proplem there. Singapour or hungary will be interesting for mguh-management

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:Piston design will be for higher pressure and not so high inertial forces for lower reving.
Actually, mean piston speed is slightly higher at 15k rpm with the new V6s than it is in the old V8s. The stroke is longer in the V6s even though the revs are reduced. In the 13.5k rpm range, the new V6 will be about the same as the V8s when limited to 18k rpm.

The Honda F1 turbo had a BMEP of 513psi. The new V6 turbo will reach max BMEP at 10.5k and will be around 460psi assuming the engine output will be max 600hp. Although this new BMEP is a little more than double the NA V8s.
Honda!

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I found this paper on a superturbo simulation. It is basically a turbo charged engine with a mechanical link to the crank as well. It draws power at low revs from the crank for the compressor and when the turbo spools it transfers power to the crank and to the compressor. So it's basically the same thing we will see minus the electrical link.
superturbo

"The simulation results showed improvements in engine brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) up to 26% at high engine speeds when compared to the GM Vortec LMG engine and BSFC improvements up to 21% at 4500 rpm when compared to the stock Ecotec LSJ engine. At lower to mid-engine speeds both models saw BSFC improvements between 5 and 20%. It was
concluded that downsizing an engine with a SuperTurboTM was a practical way to improve engine BSFC while maintaining performance."
Honda!

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Im litte bit of the curren topic, but I wan to ask if somebody can answer - is it possible to use MGU-K as engine starter in these new engines? If yes, is ther some regulation they can do this during race?
Thanks
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Mr.G wrote:Im litte bit of the curren topic, but I wan to ask if somebody can answer - is it possible to use MGU-K as engine starter in these new engines? If yes, is ther some regulation they can do this during race?
Thanks
The don't see why not, some of the early rules said they had to run purely electric in the pitlane that would mean starting the engine while exiting the pit

The rules just say they can use an external device to start the engine if they want to

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I know of a transmission system that would allow full electric use in the pits and allow starting the engine at any speed up to the electric max.
It would also do away with the clutch.
Just saying.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
632
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

dren wrote:
WhiteBlue wrote:Piston design will be for higher pressure and not so high inertial forces for lower reving.
Actually, mean piston speed is slightly higher at 15k rpm with the new V6s than it is in the old V8s. The stroke is longer in the V6s even though the revs are reduced. In the 13.5k rpm range, the new V6 will be about the same as the V8s when limited to 18k rpm.
the inertial forces are not related to piston speed, they are related to piston acceleration
piston acceleration in 2014 engines running at 13500 rpm will be about 25% less than in 2013 engines at 18000 rpm
presumably tolerable to a steel or part-steel piston

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

There are reports that Ferrari might be experimenting with smaller spark plugs.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

timbo wrote:There are reports that Ferrari might be experimenting with smaller spark plugs.
I hear reports that Ferrari has mastered to cheat the flow-limiter and found a way to by-pass the 160 kW limit.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

xpensive wrote:
timbo wrote:There are reports that Ferrari might be experimenting with smaller spark plugs.
I hear reports that Ferrari has mastered to cheat the flow-limiter and found a way to by-pass the 160 kW limit.
:lol: Very often your ironical or even cynical jokes pardon i mean comments make me laught!
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

timbo wrote:There are reports that Ferrari might be experimenting with smaller spark plugs.
Joke aside! That was rumored almost year ago. Peterr Wisdor mentioned on the racers age in episode dedicated in this this year rule changes. But he in that dont want to reveal source so he at that time only sad "little bird told me...see video"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjLruCcm ... page#t=215

But in one of previous shows i think it was episode when he were in Austin making chat show with fans, reveal his source = Marmorini (i think Marmorini wass original source afterall, even he od video below said "today").
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ZjNMqc ... lpage#t=21

Just saying... Of coarse every engine manufacturer is looking for that option.

So no "magic" bullet here i believe, after all they in last updated version of tech rules for 2014 banned (writeoff) other ignition options like laser, or plasma systems (if my memory serve well). So there are pretty restricted and closed door for other exotic interpretations.

EDIT 1: i Additionally check rules about ignition systems and i lucky remember right so they relly ver restrict material and "standardized" spark plug selection...

FIA technical rules 11.12.2013 wrote:5.11 Ignition systems :

5.11.1 Ignition is only permitted by means of a single ignition coil and single spark plug per cylinder. No more than five sparks per cylinder per engine cycle are permitted.
The use of plasma, laser or other high frequency ignition techniques is forbidden.
Only approved ignition coils may be used and the list of parts approved by the FIA, and the approval procedure, may be found in the Appendix to the Technical Regulations.
5.11.2 Only conventional spark plugs that function by high tension electrical discharge across an exposed gap are permitted. Spark plugs are not subject to the materials restrictions described in Articles 5.16 and 5.17.
After i take quick unsuccessful look I had question here. Where i can found that " Appendix (green color font, above)"?
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

They can still use smaller plugs. COnventional just refers to the geometry, the electrode position etc.
For Sure!!