You can't do the same thing with a turbo charged engine what you have done with a naturally aspirated V8.
You cannot just leave throttle open against positive pressure. There will be a blow valve. There's no reason not to have one.
why can't you do that? keeping the throttle open accomplish the same as a blow off valve it just blows through theringo wrote:You can't do the same thing with a turbo charged engine what you have done with a naturally aspirated V8.
You cannot just leave throttle open against positive pressure. There will be a blow valve. There's no reason not to have one.
I don't know either. And just remember that a blow off valve has to be directed into the exhaust. It cannot vent freely into the atmosphere.langwadt wrote:why can't you do that? keeping the throttle open accomplish the same as a blow off valve it just blows through theringo wrote:You can't do the same thing with a turbo charged engine what you have done with a naturally aspirated V8.
You cannot just leave throttle open against positive pressure. There will be a blow valve. There's no reason not to have one.
engine instead of outside
The regulations says all air entering the compressor must exit through the exhaust, I'd say that allows a bypass aroundHolm86 wrote:I don't know either. And just remember that a blow off valve has to be directed into the exhaust. It cannot vent freely into the atmosphere.langwadt wrote:why can't you do that? keeping the throttle open accomplish the same as a blow off valve it just blows through theringo wrote:You can't do the same thing with a turbo charged engine what you have done with a naturally aspirated V8.
You cannot just leave throttle open against positive pressure. There will be a blow valve. There's no reason not to have one.
engine instead of outside
Yes, that's what Holms said.langwadt wrote:The regulations says all air entering the compressor must exit through the exhaust, I'd say that allows a bypass aroundHolm86 wrote: I don't know either. And just remember that a blow off valve has to be directed into the exhaust. It cannot vent freely into the atmosphere.
the compressor
I understood what he said is as a valve from compressor output to exhaust, that is different from a valve from compressor output to compressor input, sometimes called a recirculating blow off valvewuzak wrote:Yes, that's what Holms said.langwadt wrote:The regulations says all air entering the compressor must exit through the exhaust, I'd say that allows a bypass aroundHolm86 wrote: I don't know either. And just remember that a blow off valve has to be directed into the exhaust. It cannot vent freely into the atmosphere.
the compressor
langwadt wrote: I understood what he said is as a valve from compressor output to exhaust, that is different from a valve from compressor output to compressor input, sometimes called a recirculating blow off valve
All fluids entering the compressor inlet must exit from the engine exhaust. So when the air has been compressed it cant be redirected and exit before the compressor again.5.8.1 With the exception of incidental leakage through joints (either into or out of the system), all (and only) the fluids entering the compressor inlet must exit from the engine exhaust system.
This is one of the reasons i want to keep the throttle bodies open.wuzak wrote:Re a blow-off valve - I'm not sure that it will be necessary.
Why? The blow off valve is to protect the engine when the throttles are shut and the turbo's momentum means it is still pumping air, against a much restricted air path - remember that even with closed throttles the engine will still have air passing through it.
The MGU-H will be able to stop the compressor completely if it needs to. It certainly will be able to rapidly slow the compressor down to an appropriate speed. And while it is doing that it will be generating power for the ES.
Recall that Renault mentioned the role of the MGU-H in braking energy recovery - this is what they mean. Use the turbo's momentum, which be larger than a normal turbo because of the oversize turbine, to generate power.
depends on how you interpret that rule, I'd say a valve from output to input would be legal, the air entering will exit through exhaust it has just been through the compressor more than onceHolm86 wrote:langwadt wrote: I understood what he said is as a valve from compressor output to exhaust, that is different from a valve from compressor output to compressor input, sometimes called a recirculating blow off valveAll fluids entering the compressor inlet must exit from the engine exhaust. So when the air has been compressed it cant be redirected and exit before the compressor again.5.8.1 With the exception of incidental leakage through joints (either into or out of the system), all (and only) the fluids entering the compressor inlet must exit from the engine exhaust system.
If your intent is to recover braking energy using the engine, turbocharger and the MGU-H, then the situation becomes complicated. The fundamental problem is that F1 turbochargers are fairly simple devices due to regulations. They have a single compressor directly coupled to a single turbine, without much provision for adjusting the intake/exhaust gas flow balance between them. Since the turbocharger compressor and turbine are directly coupled by a shaft, the amount of energy input/extracted by the system must be in balance. If energy is being extracted by the MGU-H using the turbocharger turbine, then that energy must have been added to the gas flow downstream of the compressor, from engine compression braking or from combusting fuel.BorisTheBlade wrote:I thought it was to drive the MGU-H as much as possible. Wasn't it?
I already know that most street cars the throttle is left slightly cracked open/or idle control valve bypass as a Means of Idle control. I just didn't want to complicate the conversation. However even when they say the throttle is "open" the slight opening is very small,not much CFM can flow throug and a blow-off valve is still needed to protect the turbocharger.neilbah wrote:smikle, i have read other posts or articles including statements by someone who works in renault (cant find the link but its on this site somewhere) that throttles on a F1 car are left pretty open these days when the throttle is lifted, probably due to the fact In the EBD situation this was put to use to seal the diffuser but it could also be useful to blow now for the benefit of the turbo which is why were having this conversation. Its already been discussed here http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 1&start=15 I guess what were describing is a form of antilag system or ALS for short but utilising cold blowing if thats possible. Id have thought its more useful/efficient to keep recirculating the energy than just dumping it in the exhaust pipe which is the only place excess boost is allowed to go seeing as according to the rules it cannot vent to atmosphere. If your blow off valve reinserts the air into the exhaust manifild between the exhaust ports and the turbine then maybe its acceptable. Im not saying they wont have a blow off for emergency sake, just that im not sure its needed. Potentially its getting slightly off thread as id consider it pneumatics
Nope. Blow off is to protect the turbocharger not the engine. The engine wont see the pressure spike, but the turbo will!wuzak wrote:Re a blow-off valve - I'm not sure that it will be necessary.
Why? The blow off valve is to protect the engine when the throttles are shut and the turbo's momentum means it is still pumping air, against a much restricted air path - remember that even with closed throttles the engine will still have air passing through it.
The MGU-H will be able to stop the compressor completely if it needs to. It certainly will be able to rapidly slow the compressor down to an appropriate speed. And while it is doing that it will be generating power for the ES.
Recall that Renault mentioned the role of the MGU-H in braking energy recovery - this is what they mean. Use the turbo's momentum, which be larger than a normal turbo because of the oversize turbine, to generate power.