joseff wrote:Really? I thought that was the turbo.
Yep. Check the top right side of the drawing, last element of drawing is turbo outlet, than (from right to left) follows turbo, differential is above turbo. If you follow (left to right) two pipes coming from exhaust (I called those elements boilers) you can see that they join up and than fall down to turbo.
But regardless on that, there is an conventional
airbox feeding cylinders directly like at any other normally aspirated engine. That engine as drawn could have turbo but turbo wouldn't be used to increase pressure in cylinders but to turn generator.
If you look closely, there is no second turbine except for one driven by exhaust gases, so that turbine must be driving some generator (most likely via some reduction). Compressing turbines are much bigger and there's no such thing in sight apart from those longitudinal tubes than lean on turbine (I guess generators are in those tubes).
So, it is not Turbocharged 2 litre V12 engine but normally aspirated 2 litre V12 engine that has exhaust gas driven turbine whose rotation has nothing to do with aspiration of engine but only with transformation of energy of exhaust gases into some other form of energy, most probably electrical.
It's a shame that none of us including me didn't notice this at first sight
That's what happens when you don't question explanation given with drawing
ss_collins, was that a deliberate test, did I won something, perhaps a lifetime subscription to Racecar Engineering?