How about if some sort of planetary gear system was used around/within the compressor?wuzak wrote:No, because if you gear the compressor it is, by definition, not linked by a common shaft. There must be a second shaft.
How about if some sort of planetary gear system was used around/within the compressor?wuzak wrote:No, because if you gear the compressor it is, by definition, not linked by a common shaft. There must be a second shaft.
It is still no linked by a common shaft. It would be linked by a shaft and some gears, and the shaft would not be "common" to both the compressor and turbine.Blaze1 wrote:How about if some sort of planetary gear system was used around/within the compressor?wuzak wrote:No, because if you gear the compressor it is, by definition, not linked by a common shaft. There must be a second shaft.
I see. Thanks.wuzak wrote:It is still no linked by a common shaft. It would be linked by a shaft and some gears, and the shaft would not be "common" to both the compressor and turbine.Blaze1 wrote:How about if some sort of planetary gear system was used around/within the compressor?wuzak wrote:No, because if you gear the compressor it is, by definition, not linked by a common shaft. There must be a second shaft.
At its fastest point the turbocharger is rotating at 100,000 revolutions
per minute, or over 1,500 times per second, so t
Given that MGU-k will be assisted by MGU-h which can per rules deliver unlimited power to either mgu-k or ES (max 4MJ), is this 2MJ limit on mgu-k part really going to be such a problem? How much can MGU-h realistically recover?wuzak wrote: Also, that the MGU-K will be limited, normally, by the 2MJ limit (the amount that it can recover on a given lap). Not the 4MJ/33.3s that is the maximum.
Energy generation:Juzh wrote:Given that MGU-k will be assisted by MGU-h which can per rules deliver unlimited power to either mgu-k or ES (max 4MJ), is this 2MJ limit on mgu-k part really going to be such a problem? How much can MGU-h realistically recover?wuzak wrote: Also, that the MGU-K will be limited, normally, by the 2MJ limit (the amount that it can recover on a given lap). Not the 4MJ/33.3s that is the maximum.
ringo wrote: what is for certain though, is that air flow will be very critical next year. It sounds counterintuitive, but if a team wants smaller sidepods, they must create bigger intake air holes for the radiators.
This is where VVT could have been useful for example. To close the exhaust valves earlier in that stage.WhiteBlue wrote:You will create a lower pressure at the exhaust valves while spooling up the turbo, but that will not have a detrimental effect to my knowledge. In cylinder air flow may also be slightly affected, but they will figure this in.
So Ferrari could be in trouble if they need to add protection?FrukostScones wrote:big trouble:
http://translate.google.de/translate?sl ... ml&act=url
Ferrai thinks there is no need for a turbo-protection-hull, Mercedes and Renault disagree, Ferrari saves some KG in a very sensitive area regarding COG