Just means the whole voting concept is even more useless. You're telling people not to use it.
Just remove it already?
I think You are very wrong here. Look at Stefan who provide us great quality pictures his rating is the highest I think mainly by that: qualityThe whole system promotes quantity over quality
You have lots of friends!Kiril Varbanov wrote:I have ~300 posts since the voting system started, 119 upvotes and apparently no downvotes at all. This must mean something.
Was the voting system already in when you joined?Kiril Varbanov wrote:I have ~300 posts since the voting system started, 119 upvotes and apparently no downvotes at all. This must mean something.
No it's not. Inappropriate votes are deleted before post removal.Diesel wrote:Another problem. Deleted posts still retain the votes. So if someone posts something off-topic, gets +10 for it, but then it get's deleted, they keep the +10.
I agree with both comments. I am the administrator of a small discussion board and we strive to increase our membership and encourage a full range of input, even from those we disagree with. F1T is exponentially larger that my little corner of the digisphere and so perhaps encouraging new members and the clash of competing ideas is not such a priority here. But in my experience, you look around one day and wonder where this member or that member has gone and why they don't post any more. One never knows why a member drifts away, but it is prudent in the long run to avoid any structural issues that promote such disappearances.I post a lot less than I used to.
The whole thing is juvenile.
I'm probably shooting myself in the foot with this, but 2 days ago one of my posts got removed (too many sexual oriented jokes from everybody concerning the noses and Richard decided to delete a lot of them), but I still have the votes for it.Steven wrote:No it's not. Inappropriate votes are deleted before post removal.Diesel wrote:Another problem. Deleted posts still retain the votes. So if someone posts something off-topic, gets +10 for it, but then it get's deleted, they keep the +10.
Downvotes usually aren't as they are obviously correct if the post requires removal.
Its a manual process to delete votes. I was on tapatalk and realised that 17 posts of innuendo was a bit too much for the car thread so got rid of them. However tapatalk doesn't show the votes so I didn't spot that you'd got votes for those posts. So its human error on my part.turbof1 wrote:one of my posts got removed (too many sexual oriented jokes from everybody concerning the noses and Richard decided to delete a lot of them), but I still have the votes for it.
Which is where the downvotes come in handy. Sadly, this has another downside. I have seen a "Who downvoted me!!!1!!1111!!" come by a few times.Diesel wrote: I post a lot less than I used to. It's depressing to post here nowadays, you just get shot down by the driver fan boys. Or the arm chair experts who are adamant anything you suggest is wrong, and don't understand how debates and discussions work.
Agreed, it is annoying, but also a part of gaining members. More and more members join, and not everyone is as knowledgable. Giving a suggestion is no problem if you ask me, the problem here is that people continue the same thing over and over again, where we will go over the same discussion again and again explaining why that won't help, which most of them will never even read.One annoying trend is the "spotting" of ducts and holes that are almost always purposed for feeding or blowing the diffuser
Well, seeing how trolls have become more and more common here and people keep repeating the same stuff for millions of times, then yes, it does need to be reviewed.Moxie wrote:The whole thing is juvenile. You do realize that there are contributors here that behave like Sheldon from the "Big Bang Theory. Don't get me wrong, I love nerds. I am a nerd, and I spend my spare time learning about race car aerodynamics. But for goodness sake, every conversation does not have to be a peer reviewed discourse.
So here's an example, it's now clear that is post was "wrong":-Steven wrote:Downvotes are basically meant to indicate incorrect information, to signal other members to treat the information with caution.
This is the reality:Steven wrote:
Downvotes are basically meant to indicate incorrect information, to signal other members to treat the information with caution.
If the latter is true, then the system is not accomplishing its stated purpose. What to do about that is for someone above my pay grade to decide.Sadly enough, the rating system isn't used on quality, but more and more by agreeing or disagreeing with someone, which destroys the whole point of the rating system.