What is aero neutral defined as? Isn't everything aero neutral that doesn't create downforce?motobaleno wrote:what about that part of rules saying that any component of the suspension system must be aero neutral?
And indeed couldn't something be aero-neutral when tested in isolation, but when combined with the rest of the car play a part in redirecting air-flow in a desired manner..??Sebp wrote:What is aero neutral defined as? Isn't everything aero neutral that doesn't create downforce?motobaleno wrote:what about that part of rules saying that any component of the suspension system must be aero neutral?
Yeah it almost looks like it, weird.... but VERY Interesting.motobaleno wrote:wow more than inclined they actually seem almost vertical!
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Yes they look more like airbrakes in the second picmotobaleno wrote:wow more than inclined they actually seem almost vertical!
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
infact we are again back to the BIG question about the spirit or the letter of the rules. If sporting rules are the same as law (where only letter counts) then rules like "any component of the suspension system must be aero neutral" should be canceled since literally they don't mean anything and you can only respect their "spirit". presently you only induce confusion (and discrimination) between teams that try to respect the spirit of the rules and teams that (rightly) respect only the letteradrianjordan wrote:And indeed couldn't something be aero-neutral when tested in isolation, but when combined with the rest of the car play a part in redirecting air-flow in a desired manner..??Sebp wrote:What is aero neutral defined as? Isn't everything aero neutral that doesn't create downforce?motobaleno wrote:what about that part of rules saying that any component of the suspension system must be aero neutral?