Ferrari F14T

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Vettel Maggot wrote:Re: Raikkonen spinning, I would have thought that would be too much rear bias, not too much toward the front?
Yeah, it might be rear brake bias. Or it might just hit the wet kerb with the rears. I don't think there's too much read into it. It can happen.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

MarkedOne8 wrote:
Vettel Maggot wrote:Re: Raikkonen spinning, I would have thought that would be too much rear bias, not too much toward the front?
No, it's opposite.
No, he's right, if you loose rears on braking then you locked them, and you can lock them dure to rearward bias.

infy
infy
5
Joined: 19 Nov 2012, 01:16

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

It could be a few things really. Bias too far rear, a sudden loss of rear downforce, sudden increase in torque caused by a downshift slowing the rear wheels or the simplest of all, Kimi may have not released the brakes fast enough to compensate for the lack of downforce in at corner entry.

MarkedOne8
MarkedOne8
10
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:30

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

timbo wrote:
MarkedOne8 wrote:
Vettel Maggot wrote:Re: Raikkonen spinning, I would have thought that would be too much rear bias, not too much toward the front?
No, it's opposite.
No, he's right, if you loose rears on braking then you locked them, and you can lock them dure to rearward bias.
I agree. My mistake.
Fernando Alonso is the best pay-to-drive driver in F1 with the biggest amount of money behind him.
http://f1bias.com/2012/04/05/truth-abou ... nder-2008/

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

MarkedOne8 wrote:
timbo wrote:No, he's right, if you loose rears on braking then you locked them, and you can lock them dure to rearward bias.
Not necessarily, it could also simply be a case of no wheels locking, but one set wanting to slow faster than the other. We didn't see any smoke from a lockup, so I'm inclined to suggest that the fronts simply wanted to slow faster than the rears, and that he hit a bump/something else unsettled the car slightly.

User avatar
SiLo
138
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Don't forget that the rear braking is much more affected by ERS that it has been in the past.
Felipe Baby!

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

beelsebob wrote:
MarkedOne8 wrote:
timbo wrote:No, he's right, if you loose rears on braking then you locked them, and you can lock them dure to rearward bias.
Not necessarily, it could also simply be a case of no wheels locking, but one set wanting to slow faster than the other. We didn't see any smoke from a lockup, so I'm inclined to suggest that the fronts simply wanted to slow faster than the rears, and that he hit a bump/something else unsettled the car slightly.
I was talking about the idea that the spin was caused by brake problem, if that was indeed so, it was clearly the case of too rearward bias, btw, you don't have to lock anything, it's just that if you combine braking and turning and much of grip capacity of the tyres is used by brakes than the lateral forces would cause tyre to slide.
However, I agree that it might not be the case of any brake problems as I noted above.

User avatar
Forza
238
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 20:55

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Jerez -Test 1 - Day 3
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Via F1.NL
Image
Image
Image

gioma
gioma
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 00:08

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Ferrari has considered 'dozens' of noses

http://en.espnf1.com/ferrari/motorsport ... 43703.html

Ferrari technical director James Allison says his team has looked at dozens of different nose types for the new F14 T, but has played down the importance of the nose for overall performance.
Read more at http://en.espnf1.com/ferrari/motorsport ... 1AT70Hm.99

"The reason there isn't a single solution is it's not actually that sensitive an area, so there are lots and lots of different solutions that work. I came from another team before that has a very aggressive solution; I worked on that with the team and this car has got another solution but there's really not much in that. They're just things that are good to talk about because they are right up at the front of the car."

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Winter Testing 2014 - Session 1, Day 3 (30.01.2014) © Sutton Images

Image
Image
Image
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

nhojekim
nhojekim
0
Joined: 02 May 2012, 06:46

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

So they already bolted a new diffuser..

lombers
lombers
0
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 13:40

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Crabbia wrote:I really dont think the nose is as contradictory as everyone is saying. the tub is still very high, and we saw from the flovis, it goes round the first part of the nose, not up and over.
It's interesting because I asked Scarbs on twitter what he thought of all the discussion regarding the new noses and their effect on the overall aerodynamic package of the car. His response was:
they're not as important as the attention they draw. details around the sidepods and back of the car are more critical
I would agree with this statement, I don't think the different nose solutions will have significant effect on the aero packages of the 2014 cars. From an aesthetics perspective, well that's something completely different altogether :)

User avatar
Cuky
65
Joined: 07 Dec 2011, 19:41
Location: Rab, Croatia

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

nhojekim wrote:So they already bolted a new diffuser..

well, it is called testing...they are testing different parts to see which one works better, to compare results from wind tunnel and CFD to those measured on track,...

User avatar
scuderiafan
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 15:14
Location: United States

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Cuky wrote:
nhojekim wrote:So they already bolted a new diffuser..

well, it is called testing...they are testing different parts to see which one works better, to compare results from wind tunnel and CFD to those measured on track,...
But they've been working on it forever, it should be perfect out of the box!

/sarcasm
"You're so angry that you throw your gloves down, and the worst part is; you have to pick them up again." - Steve Matchett

Patiently waiting...

User avatar
Redragon
19
Joined: 24 May 2011, 12:23

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Via DAMNINice and posted on Mercedes thread, a relative information regarding brakes and why Raikonen might have lost the rear on that video

"Rosberg giving his opinion about new brakes.

Q: How is it driving the "brake by wire system"? Do you feel confident braking?
A: "It´s complicated to describe. the front is a standard brake. Only the rear is nearly completely braked by the ERS. On high speeds you have plenty of downforce so you have a fully angaged rear brake. It´s like using the handbrake on a normal car.
When slowing down the car, the downforce is lower so you have to release the brake. To set this up is really complicated. The balance between the mechanical front and nearly completely electrical rear brake is key and complicated. At the moment it´s not perfectly adjusted. I don´t know what I´ve written but I hope you´ve understood "