Formula E

Please discuss here all your remarks and pose your questions about all racing series, except Formula One. Both technical and other questions about GP2, Touring cars, IRL, LMS, ...
User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Formula E

Post

Sure, good line-up for the very first seasson =D>

Paulington
Paulington
0
Joined: 04 Feb 2014, 19:21

Re: Formula E

Post

That was embarrassing. Honestly. It's an electric motor with quite hard tyres so it should be doing donuts beyond that even of Vettel, but it was just a damning exhibit of how little power they have for how heavy they are.

My only thought is that this must have been running the 50bhp motor configuration, but even then, not exactly the publicity event they were hoping for I'd imagine!

I hope this goes well, but battery technology really needs to improve, and fast.

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Formula E

Post

Paulington wrote: but battery technology really needs to improve, and fast.
Well, that's partly the point of the championship, isn't it?
In most cases, the majority is below the average.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Formula E

Post

hollus wrote:
Paulington wrote: but battery technology really needs to improve, and fast.
Well, that's partly the point of the championship, isn't it?
spec battery pack I thought.....

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Formula E

Post

First year, yes. Spec pretty much everything. But in (if) year two and year three...
In most cases, the majority is below the average.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Formula E

Post

Paulington wrote:
That was embarrassing. Honestly. It's an electric motor with quite hard tyres so it should be doing donuts beyond that even of Vettel, but it was just a damning exhibit of how little power they have for how heavy they are.

My only thought is that this must have been running the 50bhp motor configuration, but even then, not exactly the publicity event they were hoping for I'd imagine!

I hope this goes well, but battery technology really needs to improve, and fast.
From the end of the second video....
Lucas di Grassi wrote:I think with four times the power we have now....
A F1 with just 200hp (1/4 standard power) would be embarrassing too

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Formula E

Post

Alguersuari, Minassian, Klien, Katherine Legge..... and The Stig :mrgreen: are also confirmed, final line-up:

Daniel Abt (GER)
Christijan Albers (NLD)
Jaime Alguersuari (ESP)
Marco Andretti (USA)
Sébastien Bourdais (FRA)
Alex Brundle (GBR)
Sebastien Buemi (CHE)
Karun Chandhok (IND)
Ben Collins (GBR)
Conor Daly (USA)
Robert Doornbos (NLD)
Lucas di Grassi (BRA)
John R. Hildebrand Jr. (USA)
Ma Qing Hua (CHN)
Narain Karthikeyan (IND)
Christian Klien (AUT)
Katherine Legge (GBR)
Vitantonio Liuzzi (ITA)
Nicolas Minassian (FRA)
Franck Montagny (FRA)
Takuma Sato (JPN)
Bruno Senna (BRA)
Oriol Servia (ESP)
Adrien Tambay (FRA)


http://www.fiaformulae.com/news/formula ... ivers-club

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Formula E

Post

OMG, didn´t realice about Servia! :o

Didn´t expect to see him leaving the USA after so many years....

Blanchimont
Blanchimont
214
Joined: 09 Nov 2012, 23:47

Re: Formula E

Post

I don't know if we can expect more action/power from these cars. The engineer Theophile Gouzin talks (0:37 to 0:50 in the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWxPtWd62Ek ) about the battery capacity being 8kWh, ~25% of the 30kWh that the final cars should have.

It's di Grassi who talks about 4 times the power, maybe he mixed power and capacity up?

The power figures from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIA_Formula_E_Championship are:

Power
Max power (limited): 200 kW, equivalent to 270 bhp
Race mode (power-saving): 133 kW, equivalent to 180 bhp
Push-to-Pass: 67 kW
Dear FIA, if you read this, please pm me for a redesign of the Technical Regulations to avoid finger nose shapes for 2016! :-)

Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: Formula E

Post

Blanchimont wrote: The power figures from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIA_Formula_E_Championship are:

Power
Max power (limited): 200 kW, equivalent to 270 bhp
Race mode (power-saving): 133 kW, equivalent to 180 bhp
Push-to-Pass: 67 kW
meanwhile.....

Eliica

Image

runs on a lithium-ion battery and can accelerate from 0–100 km/h (62 mph) in four seconds
(faster than the Porsche 911 Turbo at the time). In 2004, the Eliica reached a speed of 370 km/h (230 mph)
on Italy's Nardò High Speed Track. Weighs 2,400 kg, the platform contains 4 tracks of 80 batteries.
The Acceleration model is made for the street and has a top speed of 190 km/h (120 mph) with a range of 320 km.

Mind you: this technology is 10 years old, back when F1 cars were still running v10's and there was zero talk about a formula E class nor hybrids in motorsports.

drayson b12/69ev

Image

The B12/69EV has been presented during the Low Carbon Racing Conference at the NEC in London. This is an electric race car prototype, a technology demonstrator dedicated to break records on international race tracks.
Lola-Drayson B12/69EV is powered by a lithium battery nanophosphate chemistry, which can be charged in just fifteen minutes. Moreover, the process is non-contact charging

Read more: http://cutedecision.com/lola-drayson-th ... z2tCXvCaJb

-Inductive charging
-Moveable aerodynamics
-Electrical regenerative damping
-Lithium Nanophosphate A123 System
-850hp for 1000kg, allowing a 0 to 100kph in 3.0 ...

Combined Power 856 bhp / 639 KW
Power to weight 0.79 bhp / kg
Top Speed 329 km/h (204 mph)
Torque is rated at 3,000Nm

Rimac One

Image

a total output of 811 kW (1,088 hp) and 1,600 N·m (1,200 lbf·ft) of torque, the Concept One will accelerate from 0–97 km/h (0–60 mph) in 2.8 seconds and will have an electronically limited top speed of 304 km/h (189 mph)
powered by a 91 kWh lithium iron phosphate battery, giving the car a range of 500 km (310 mi) per charge

Formula E

Performance

Acceleration: 0 – 100 km/h (0-62 mph) in 3 s - Estimated
Maximum speed: 225 km/h (140 mph) (FIA limited) - Estimated
what went wrong with the Formula E car? it looks extremely fragile and breakable and it sounds like a home-built RC car built by a 6 year old of some parts found in the trash.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

Lycoming
Lycoming
106
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 22:58

Re: Formula E

Post

The low power is probably due to a combination of range and cost concerns with respect to the size of the batteries.

And I would argue that it looks no more fragile than any other open wheeler.

Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: Formula E

Post

Lycoming wrote:The low power is probably due to a combination of range and cost concerns with respect to the size of the batteries.

And I would argue that it looks no more fragile than any other open wheeler.
RicerDude wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc4ZuniHh30[/url][/youtube]
looks pretty fragile and cheap to me. and this should be arguably the breeding programme for high-tech electric racing
innovation. cough. not even close.

and low power? the cars mentioned above are able to run a complete race distance whilst being much heavier.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_cRqcbXAs4[/youtube]

just take a look at the drayson b12 running. it makes the formula E car look amateur at best.

how about the volar-e

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHwbCEnWMAw[/youtube]

i'm not saying there isn't effort put into the formula e car, it is just totally underwhelming. the side crash structure looks weird too. it just looks.....cheap. if i look at these electric car projects, it's just a huge dissatisfacion and disappointing to see the formula e-car result.

throw me in a couple of vector-e 's, a couple of rimac one's, and some drayson b12's, hell, get some tesla roadsters, some bmw i8's, audi e-trons, and some more in there and you have something WAYYY more exciting then this already boring formula e before it has even begun. imagine the innovation will be the result of such a racing class, when they can get a prize and prestige of winning electric grand prix' and championships. make it a prestige, make it important, make it a media spectacle. It'll bring technology from racing to street use because of development and inventions. With such a racing feat, you'd have a whole lot more potential in research for electric battery mileage which instantly will benefit into road-use.

instead we have some controlled, boring, cheap and regulated grey product. #-o
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

Lycoming
Lycoming
106
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 22:58

Re: Formula E

Post

Manoah2u wrote:looks pretty fragile and cheap to me.
What part of it looks fragile and cheap? The hard plastic clattering sound? That's just because it's filmed on a GoPro. It looks -imilar to a Pro Mazda or Formula 3 car, which makes sense as they're all about the same power output. It's not like you can even see any visible flex.
Manoah2u wrote: the side crash structure looks weird too. it just looks.....cheap.
What specifically about it looks cheap? it looks very similar to what you'll find under the sidepod of any F1 car.
Right now, it just sounds like you're looking for anything you can possibly find to criticize.
Manoah2u wrote: and this should be arguably the breeding programme for high-tech electric racing
innovation. cough. not even close.
I would argue that it's innovative in the sense of being the first actual racing series to be established. If you expect them to be a source of innovative new technology... that's not something you should look for in any motor racing series, much less a spec series. They never have the budget to actually develop new technology.
Manoah2u wrote:and low power? the cars mentioned above are able to run a complete race distance whilst being much heavier.
The Drayson car costs several times as much as what the Formula-E cars are cost capped to. Batteries are expensive. Also, Drayson also never lists a range for it. The best I could find was ">15 minutes" running time in race mode, Which doesn't actually tell you very much.
Manoah2u wrote: It'll bring technology from racing to street use because of development and inventions.
This is unlikely in any case.
Manoah2u wrote:With such a racing feat, you'd have a whole lot more potential in research for electric battery mileage which instantly will benefit into road-use.
There are much better and cheaper ways to rack up testing mileage on electric powertrains, ways that involve much less risk of crashing.
Manoah2u wrote:instead we have some controlled, boring, cheap and regulated grey product. #-o
Because otherwise nobody would be able to afford to run it and you'd have no series at all.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Formula E

Post

Manoah2u wrote:throw me in a couple of vector-e 's, a couple of rimac one's, and some drayson b12's, hell, get some tesla roadsters, some bmw i8's, audi e-trons, and some more in there and you have something WAYYY more exciting then this already boring formula e before it has even begun. imagine the innovation will be the result of such a racing class, when they can get a prize and prestige of winning electric grand prix' and championships. make it a prestige, make it important, make it a media spectacle. It'll bring technology from racing to street use because of development and inventions. With such a racing feat, you'd have a whole lot more potential in research for electric battery mileage which instantly will benefit into road-use.

instead we have some controlled, boring, cheap and regulated grey product. #-o

Be patient, this is all new, you can´t start a new category trying to match F1 perfomance at first try

You´re being too rude judging FE when you´ve not seen it yet, give it a chance at least. First year they´re supposed to match F3 perfomance, I don´t think that´s embarrasing like some of you are stating. First year of a championship perfomance is not as important as a good line-up, teams with some reputation, affordable costs...

If first seasson goes well then I´m sure they´ll improve a lot of aspects, allowing the teams to evolve some new parts of the car, but first seasson it´s more important to keep the costs down I think

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Formula E

Post

Blanchimont wrote:I don't know if we can expect more action/power from these cars. The engineer Theophile Gouzin talks (0:37 to 0:50 in the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWxPtWd62Ek ) about the battery capacity being 8kWh, ~25% of the 30kWh that the final cars should have.

It's di Grassi who talks about 4 times the power, maybe he mixed power and capacity up?

The power figures from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIA_Formula_E_Championship are:

Power
Max power (limited): 200 kW, equivalent to 270 bhp
Race mode (power-saving): 133 kW, equivalent to 180 bhp
Push-to-Pass: 67 kW
Max power of an electric setup depend on the battery capacity too. The power of an electric setup depend on the voltage and current, and the current depend of the max discharging rate of the battery. The max discharging rate of the battery is a parameter directly proportional to the capacity, to the point it´s usually a factor of the capacity, 10C, 15C, 20C, 60C.... so if you do a test with a reduced capacity battery, also the power of the setup is reduced.

I don´t think they´re using the batteries to the full discharging capacity because a battery discharged at 10C only last 6 minutes, but I guess if they usually discharge it at 2C, with a reduced capacity battery for those tests they probably limited the max power also to keep that 2C discharging rate. This way even if the battery is 1/4 of the capacity they will use, these tests are stressing the battery to the same level it will be stressed in race. If they´d keep the max power with just 1/4 of the capacity, they´d be stressing the battery 4 times more than with the standard setup