That has to be the first picture you've posted without your watermark all over it. Unlucky mate.zioture wrote: It is the same picture I posted Omincorse have canceled the red arrows, you can see something of red in pic
That has to be the first picture you've posted without your watermark all over it. Unlucky mate.zioture wrote: It is the same picture I posted Omincorse have canceled the red arrows, you can see something of red in pic
https://twitter.com/ScarbsF1/status/436134210844102656Holm86 wrote:https://twitter.com/ScarbsF1/status/436111349660147713turbof1 wrote:I don't think they'll miss out on the start motor hole; it's an obvious aero benefit.
That is noble of you, but to be honest also naive. And the fact that they took that image is implicating something much worse, that is omnicorse ripping off ideas here without proper credit to the original poster.zioture wrote:IT's ok anyway on my twitter there is time and ma twit is previus of omnicorse article
No problem with omnicorse only personal satisfaction
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
The car has some sort of 60's flavor on this pictureAvocado wrote:http://motorsport.nextgen-auto.com/gall ... ev/191.jpg
He still managed to crop out Sutton's though.Owen.C93 wrote:That has to be the first picture you've posted without your watermark all over it. Unlucky mate.zioture wrote: It is the same picture I posted Omincorse have canceled the red arrows, you can see something of red in pic
Also the "technical explaination" is incomplete (wrong?): they say the nolders are for downforce, and overlook the function of increasing cooling with the low pressure behind themturbof1 wrote:That is noble of you, but to be honest also naive. And the fact that they took that image is implicating something much worse, that is omnicorse ripping off ideas here without proper credit to the original poster.zioture wrote:IT's ok anyway on my twitter there is time and ma twit is previus of omnicorse article
No problem with omnicorse only personal satisfaction