McG wrote:Xwang wrote:Such a rake is maintained also when the car is running? Otherwise it could be that rear suspension is softer than rivals' ones to have better traction. I'm wrong?
It flattens out at higher speed.
Ok.
And according to you it flattens more than rivals?
In my opinion if at a typical turn speed (the one which is usually found on F1 circuits and/or which has been chosen as the "nominal" cornering speed by the RB team) the rake is similar to other cars, then I presume the rear suspension is softer than rivals' one (better traction in slow turns).
Otherwise if the same "rake angular gain" is maintained when running, then suspension is as stiff as rival, but if they can manage the flow to be attached, the aerodynamic efficiency of the RB flat plate is greater and so we should expect much more corner velocity than rivals.
Do you agree?