No it's not different. I've never heard the term flow angles. All cornering work is done solely on the rate of turning compared to the speed of the car, hence the term "yaw" used in the aeronatical industry. And The longer the car the more noticeable the yaw effects.shelly wrote:It is not really like that - even in steady state the flow angles are different in cornering - so different that, for example, a cfd vendor developed some function of its software specifically for testing steady cornering condition
It will cause as much instability as having a camera pod on the right side of the engine cover and none on the left. It's not a big deal.ecapox wrote:You are 100% right. It doesn't make sense, what he said. I just think that what he was thinking didn't come out right it words. His overall point was that having this strange nose is going to cause instability...and I do agree with that. Maybe not a lot. And maybe the drivers will get used to it. But I do believe this instability will exist.
I believe he said this to an Italian F1 news site. Then someone translated it into English so perhaps there is something not translated properly.ecapox wrote:I'd hardly call Scalabroni "this guy" and I'd hardly call ANYTHING he says "nonsense".
Disagree if you'd like as we are all entitled to our own opinions. But as he has decades of F1 experience over multiple teams, I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. It is possible that he misspoke or since English isn't his native language, maybe he chose the wrong word.
Well considering this:ecapox wrote: His overall point was that having this strange nose is going to cause instability...and I do agree with that. Maybe not a lot. And maybe the drivers will get used to it. But I do believe this instability will exist.
I believe whatever effect it has on stability will be negligible, until somebody articulates a clear and sensible argument otherwise.ringo wrote:It will cause as much instability as having a camera pod on the right side of the engine cover and none on the left. It's not a big deal.
Why not? That's exactly the trap - thinking anyone is infallible and that everything they say is either (a) true or (b) true all the time. Doesn't matter what their name is. Not one bit.ecapox wrote:I'd hardly call Scalabroni "this guy" and I'd hardly call ANYTHING he says "nonsense".
Indeed. For example, you might think orange sherbet is the best type of ice cream. I would disagree and judge chocolate chip cookie dough to be superior. Opinions are one thing, engineering is another. Some of the things I've seen in these videos and articles just aren't correct - some spoken and some written / illustrated. Not calling the guy a bum, just calling it how it is in these examples.Disagree if you'd like as we are all entitled to our own opinions.
and that's flow angleringo wrote:
No it's not different. I've never heard the term flow angles. All cornering work is done solely on the rate of turning compared to the speed of the car,