WALL_ZACK wrote:
I don't think RBR have missed a trick as such, the philosophy of the front end of their car is just different to Mercedes & Ferrari and so the least disruptive camera housing (i.e. not there at all) is the best fit for what they're doing.
Mercedes/Ferrari use their camera housings to coax the air washing off the sides of their nose cone into the flow under the chassis/through the suspension rather than trying to maximise the height of the nose tip to accomplish the same thing.
I still don't buy this. For Ferrari we can argue with the shape of the nose, ok...but for Merc there is no reasonable explanation for anything like guiding the air. And if the camera would be in an upgoing stream it would not be in a "streamline" shape and produce drag and lift.
For me the air running through the suspension is more or less useless for "designing" downforce. It has an effect, but it is very hard to work with it. So Merc has put the camera as high a possible by the rules, right in front of the front suspension, in order not to produce even more "dirty" air and to keep it as far away as possible from the front wing upwash.
So for me the mandatory cameras are just a problem, not a help. RedBull has completely solved this problem with their solution.