Retiring from pole or having your tire blow up in the lead whilst your teammate goes on to win the race in your place is definitely not the same as retiring from 5th and 6th.Aesto wrote: Right, that's why Rosberg has had 3 reliability-related retirements last year, as opposed to zero for Hamilton
Yup i think you are spot on, nice one.Aesto wrote:Australia, China, Hungary. It probably doesn't count the latter, because technically he was still classified since the engine blew only five laps before the finish.SectorOne wrote:3?Aesto wrote:Right, that's why Rosberg has had 3 reliability-related retirements last year, as opposed to zero for Hamilton
I remember one (Hungary when he retired from 8th) but F1Fanatic says only 2 retirements.
Surely you're not being serious? Are you suggesting that Hamilton's mental frame may have an effect on how reliable the power unit will be?Chuckjr wrote: Quite possibly, actually.
Look up and do some reading if you want on morphogenetic fields, Rupert Sheldrake, imaginal cells and Bruce Lipton. The human mind is capable of much more than simply bowing to Newtonian physics, and aligning to the sensorial oriented experience.
...maybe intermediatesmikeerfol wrote: Medium-Hard, as always.
Do you know what gear ratios each team has chosen?De Jokke wrote:Anyone concerned about the gear ratios of the merc on these long malaysian straights?
I believe what he means is concern that Merc will run away with it because they appear to have very long gears, not concern for the team.SamH123 wrote:Do you know what gear ratios each team has chosen?De Jokke wrote:Anyone concerned about the gear ratios of the merc on these long malaysian straights?
Why would anyone be concerned by Mercs gear ratios for Malaysia, I was under the impression they had long gears because they often topped speed traps in Aus
beelsebob wrote:I believe what he means is concern that Merc will run away with it because they appear to have very long gears, not concern for the team.SamH123 wrote:Do you know what gear ratios each team has chosen?De Jokke wrote:Anyone concerned about the gear ratios of the merc on these long malaysian straights?
Why would anyone be concerned by Mercs gear ratios for Malaysia, I was under the impression they had long gears because they often topped speed traps in Aus
They'd need to relax the fuel flow limit to make that possible.heidenreich27 wrote:Maybe fia can force them to use atleast 13.000 rev?
No I mean (looking at last years car topspeed and gear ratios), are we going to be okay on the straights in Sepang?beelsebob wrote:I believe what he means is concern that Merc will run away with it because they appear to have very long gears, not concern for the team.SamH123 wrote:Do you know what gear ratios each team has chosen?De Jokke wrote:Anyone concerned about the gear ratios of the merc on these long malaysian straights?
Why would anyone be concerned by Mercs gear ratios for Malaysia, I was under the impression they had long gears because they often topped speed traps in Aus
Crikey, this reminds me of the endless debates about Ralf Schumacher & Montoya and the case of the grenading BMW's.el-Magico wrote:No, but I did hear about Murphy's law..Aesto wrote: Have you ever heard of the law of large numbers?
Huh? Merc were hitting 335km/h in Bahrain testing, they stated they thought they could probably do 360km/h at Monza... Of course the car is geared long enough for Malaysia.De Jokke wrote:No I mean (looking at last years car topspeed and gear ratios), are we going to be okay on the straights in Sepang?
Guess I'm still a bit non-believing after the surprisingly low top speeds last year... Still don't understand how they could mess that up with the best engine. Every race faulty gear ratios?beelsebob wrote:Huh? Merc were hitting 335km/h in Bahrain testing, they stated they thought they could probably do 360km/h at Monza... Of course the car is geared long enough for Malaysia.De Jokke wrote:No I mean (looking at last years car topspeed and gear ratios), are we going to be okay on the straights in Sepang?