Ferrari F14T

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

I my opinion its to obvious that Ferrari use the "Renault" airbox behind engine towards compressor turbine.

So no split turbo here, very little chance that Tobias was right.
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

What's that black box below the exhaust manifold?
For Sure!!

.poz
.poz
50
Joined: 08 Mar 2012, 16:44

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

aleks_ader wrote:I my opinion its to obvious that Ferrari use the "Renault" airbox behind engine towards compressor turbine.

So no split turbo here, very little chance that Tobias was right.

You are right, rumors say that the MGU-H is under the turbo

Image

miguelalvesreis
miguelalvesreis
17
Joined: 12 May 2012, 13:38

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

.poz wrote:
aleks_ader wrote:I my opinion its to obvious that Ferrari use the "Renault" airbox behind engine towards compressor turbine.

So no split turbo here, very little chance that Tobias was right.

You are right, rumors say that the MGU-H is under the turbo

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5521387/engine.jpg
There is a shaft connecting the turbine and the compressor on both solutions, since the MGU-H has to be mechanically connected to the turbo, why can't be on the turbine side of it? Has to be directly on the compressor? Can't be to the shaft in between the compressor and the turbine?

Ganxxta
Ganxxta
3
Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 22:09
Location: Germany, NRW

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Has anyone heard/read any news about updates and performance improvements for Malaysia?

Only thing I've seen is the rumored software update for Bahrain...

User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Omnicorse ran a story blaming FIA for something related to ERS in F14T - http://www.omnicorse.it/magazine/35940/ ... -della-fia

I couldn't get all the details, so if someone with fluent Italian can translate the most important bits, I think everyone will appreciate it.

User avatar
elFranZ
15
Joined: 27 Mar 2012, 14:00

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Kiril Varbanov wrote:Omnicorse ran a story blaming FIA for something related to ERS in F14T - http://www.omnicorse.it/magazine/35940/ ... -della-fia

I couldn't get all the details, so if someone with fluent Italian can translate the most important bits, I think everyone will appreciate it.

FIA messed up with their remote "lanch mode" flagging system, which leaves the cars with no mgu-k before the 100km/h limit (on a side note, I didn't know that such system existed at all). Ferrari's PU have all been affected by this "bug", forcing pilots to do a lot of manual work on their wheels to get the missing power back (just like Alonso stated after the race). The problem was fixed after the first pit stop.

User avatar
outsid3r
9
Joined: 01 Nov 2012, 22:55

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

elFranZ wrote:FIA messed up with their remote "lanch mode" flagging system, which leaves the cars with no mgu-k before the 100km/h limit (on a side note, I didn't know that such system existed at all). Ferrari's PU have all been affected by this "bug", forcing pilots to do a lot of manual work on their wheels to get the missing power back (just like Alonso stated after the race). The problem was fixed after the first pit stop.
omnicorse is also urging ferrari to do a formal protest and not let it pass by just like they did until now. They are saying that had it been Red Bull, the FIA wouldn't have been let off the hook so easily. They are also certain that the ferraris would have been on podium had it not been this issue

atlantis
atlantis
21
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 14:33

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Leo Turrini reports that a few heads (responsible for the hybrid engine) at Ferrari rolled down today.

(edit= sorry for not being on topic about the car, feel free to move/delete the post)

.poz
.poz
50
Joined: 08 Mar 2012, 16:44

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

From omnicorse:

Ferrari says their PU is not overweight. Ferrari voted against 10kg minimum weight increase.
Ferrari will not use the metal ring around the turbo as their lighter solution was approved by FIA.

http://www.omnicorse.it/magazine/35979/ ... sovrappeso

donskar
donskar
2
Joined: 03 Feb 2007, 16:41
Location: Cardboard box, end of Boulevard of Broken Dreams

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

atlantis wrote:Leo Turrini reports that a few heads (responsible for the hybrid engine) at Ferrari rolled down today.

(edit= sorry for not being on topic about the car, feel free to move/delete the post)
Can anyone add details to this story?
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

donskar wrote: Can anyone add details to this story?
------> Team Thread http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 1&start=75
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

User avatar
motobaleno
11
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 13:58

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

donskar wrote:
atlantis wrote:Leo Turrini reports that a few heads (responsible for the hybrid engine) at Ferrari rolled down today.

(edit= sorry for not being on topic about the car, feel free to move/delete the post)
Can anyone add details to this story?
According to ferrari no head rolled down but there was only a redistribution of duties and responsibilities.
A soft way to confirm the rumors I would say...
probably none was really fired.
A young engineer named enrico gualtieri has been given more responsibilities. He used to work in the reliability team

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

.poz wrote:From omnicorse:

Ferrari says their PU is not overweight. Ferrari voted against 10kg minimum weight increase.
Ferrari will not use the metal ring around the turbo as their lighter solution was approved by FIA.

http://www.omnicorse.it/magazine/35979/ ... sovrappeso
- engine weight - fine, it took them a while to clarify it and Amus was wrong.
- turbo cover - same, I don't think it's the end of it but we'll see. Innovative means no heavy cover but what instead?
- what about overall overweight situation, no clarification on that? (or if engine was rumoured/responsible the same applies)

User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: Ferrari F14T

Post

Simone Resta and Nicolas Tombazis talk about AUS and look ahead at the MAL GP feat. aero and CFD, wind tunnels - http://formula1.ferrari.com/news/malays ... efficiency