..Jef Patat wrote:Indeed I do. I was also quite amazed that Kevin took the blame, suprisingly humble in my opinion. Kevin might have made a judgement error, but so did Kimi. Kimi made an error, corrected for it without judging correctly where Kevin might have been. If I remember correctly Kevin was what is considered alongside Kimi. That's a double error from Kimi. That's how I saw it, both drivers misjudging, normal racing incident, no big deal.Rikhart wrote:You "see it" different than the very person who got punished for the accident, and fully took the blame for it. Maybe you arent seeing it that well? Just a thought.Jef Patat wrote: I share your opinion, find it strange that this hasn't been discussed on the forum, or I missed it. Raik is moaning in every press that mag 'destroyed' their race. I saw it differently.
20.4 Any driver defending his position on a straight, and before any braking area, may use the full width of the track during his first move, provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his. Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason.
For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a 'significant portion'.
..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvSb0TSjfnE
Kimi turned and drove over Kevins front wing so he must have been along side. Kimi didn't look in his mirrors, Kevin expected Kimi to know he was there, they were both wrong, it was just racing.
I think Kevin mostly took the blame for costing the team points by making a too risky move very early in a long race