McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Jef Patat
Jef Patat
61
Joined: 06 May 2011, 14:40

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Happened to have found the answer to my own question:

http://adamcooperf1.com/2014/03/31/boul ... r-mclaren/

Boullier:
I think with the heat we knew we would suffer because the tyres were degrading much more, and overheating, and this is where the other teams gained.
Could it be related to their suspension? Doing more bad than good?

Gaz.
Gaz.
4
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 09:53

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Jef Patat wrote:
Thunders wrote:That Front wing Stakes look amazing. Never seen them curved.
Indeed, can't get my head around it at all. The curvature also increases outwards, looks cool, but i wonder why. Anyone?
Would they cause a vortex that could help channel air around the front wheels? :?:
Forza Jules

frosty125
frosty125
14
Joined: 20 Feb 2014, 19:34

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

So am I right to think that this car has a good balance and good low speed traction. In Malaysia I noticed despite the Williams having good top speed and clearly greater pace the McLaren seemed to launch it onto the straights out of the slower corners. Perhaps this is where the wishbones are at their most effective?

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Jef Patat wrote: Could it be related to their suspension? Doing more bad than good?
I think it's more the lack of Downforce. They need to gain quickly there.
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

User avatar
willmesquita
3
Joined: 23 Feb 2014, 20:51

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Thunders wrote:
Jef Patat wrote: Could it be related to their suspension? Doing more bad than good?
I think it's more the lack of Downforce. They need to gain quickly there.
Damn that cokebottle...the rear of MP4-29 is just too fat in comparision to RB10 and W05...
To do something well is so worthwhile that to die trying to do it better cannot be foolhardy. It would be a waste of life to do nothing with one's ability, for I feel that life is measured in achievement, not in years alone. ― Bruce McLaren

papayaorange.com.br

JDC123
JDC123
30
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 21:02

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

willmesquita wrote:
Thunders wrote:
Jef Patat wrote: Could it be related to their suspension? Doing more bad than good?
I think it's more the lack of Downforce. They need to gain quickly there.
Damn that cokebottle...the rear of MP4-29 is just too fat in comparision to RB10 and W05...
I totally agree, but it was better to start the season with a reliable car which can be refined than to be attempting to fix major issues with the car. Touch wood, the McLaren has been one of the most reliable cars so far, apart from fp3 at the weekend. I have every confidence McLaren can develop this car into a winner; they have always been good a developing through the season and with some good technical staff coming in during the winter this should be further evidence they will do the same this year.

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

The coke-bottle shape is merely reflective of the overall design philosophy, it's not like a "1-100 scale of how good a car is". As the McLaren has novel, unique rear aero attributes it stands to reason that this coke-bottle shaping is intentional.
#58

Jef Patat
Jef Patat
61
Joined: 06 May 2011, 14:40

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Gridlock wrote:The coke-bottle shape is merely reflective of the overall design philosophy, it's not like a "1-100 scale of how good a car is". As the McLaren has novel, unique rear aero attributes it stands to reason that this coke-bottle shaping is intentional.
My intuition is the same I think. The lower part of the coke bottle end doesn't need to be as tight as RB or Merc, the airflow is 'obstructed' by the buttefly arms by intention to create low pressure behind them, so it's better to guide the air somewhere else. I find it hard to get a grip on whether a clean coke bottle is a better rear downforce strategy than the butterflies.

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

A few more Shots of the New Nose / Wing.

Image
Image
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Sorry if repost. Didnt see this pic in this thread before.
From Scarbs
Image

User avatar
willmesquita
3
Joined: 23 Feb 2014, 20:51

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Jef Patat wrote:
Gridlock wrote:The coke-bottle shape is merely reflective of the overall design philosophy, it's not like a "1-100 scale of how good a car is". As the McLaren has novel, unique rear aero attributes it stands to reason that this coke-bottle shaping is intentional.
My intuition is the same I think. The lower part of the coke bottle end doesn't need to be as tight as RB or Merc, the airflow is 'obstructed' by the buttefly arms by intention to create low pressure behind them, so it's better to guide the air somewhere else. I find it hard to get a grip on whether a clean coke bottle is a better rear downforce strategy than the butterflies.
You probably right, I saw in another thread this numbers on F1 car downforce generation( numbers from 2004):

...I've heard that the distribuition of downforce is aproximatly:

35 - 40% - rear wing
25 - 35% - front wing
20 - 25% - diffuser
5 - 10% - body work (including flip ups.....etc)


What means McLaren need to work more on our wings (and - I can't resist - explains why Red Bull has so much downforce...).
To do something well is so worthwhile that to die trying to do it better cannot be foolhardy. It would be a waste of life to do nothing with one's ability, for I feel that life is measured in achievement, not in years alone. ― Bruce McLaren

papayaorange.com.br

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

2004 aero rules were very different to today so those figures are probably a fair bit out now.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Bahrain Thursday via AMuS

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

So there's hope for the old Nose to survive the attack of that pesky ugly one? ^^
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

Jef Patat
Jef Patat
61
Joined: 06 May 2011, 14:40

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

But surprised to see the old nose again :?

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes

Post

Bahrain 2014 - Thursday (03.04.2014)

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985