I always wondered whence the optimism at Mercedes came regarding their engine. This may very well be it.sectionate wrote:
From what the BBC said, it wasn't the Engine guys that came up with it, it was the chassis people at Mercedes who asked for the move to happen as it freed up space at the back of the car!
BBC Sport's chief F1 writer Andrew Benson in Bahrain:
"During Friday practice we explained why the Mercedes car is so fast, because of a clever layout of the engine, with the compressor at the front and the turbine at the back, which reduces throttle lag, improves weight and packaging and frees up the electrical parts of the power unit to produce more power at the wheels.
We have a bit more info now on the detail behind that. The key is the better airflow into the compressor, because the air has less far to travel from the inlet. Less pressure loss at the compressor leads to more power than is available from the Ferrari and Renault engines. The interesting thing is that apparently the idea initially came from the chassis team, aware of the potential packaging, weight and weight distribution advantages of splitting the turbine and compressor. The engine team realised it was an enormous technical challenge and were not initially sure whether they could pull it off. But they have, and the results are spectacular."
- Best integration of chassis and enginemyurr wrote:Yes - more power, less lag, lighter weight, smaller intercooler giving better internal air flow, moves weight forward which is a benefit this year. There are a lot of benefits to that relatively simple innovation.RichardF1 wrote:Could the advantage be from moving the compressor to the front of the engine? Sky sports F1 we're reporting that moving that away from the turbine means the packaging is smaller in the side pods due to a cooler compressor being away from the turbine, as well as less pipe work, leading to less turbo lag. Cue the poor pun but is that the silver bullet for the silver arrows?
But it's worth acknowledging that the entire car is top of its class in all departments, there's no one silver bullet but equally there's not really any one weakness. It's a beautifully designed and put together race car.
Yes! This is just reflection wich is projected on the endplate. Still interesting "illusion".tranquility2k4 wrote:Are Mercedes trialing a tighter cooling solution at the back of the car?
Firstly: Bigger ears?
http://i.imgur.com/7zMMXPT.jpg
Now look at the back left of the car:
http://i.imgur.com/7P9P4iI.jpg
nd the back right of the car in this:
http://i.imgur.com/PaGdhhm.jpg
They appear to have tested the new panel on both left and right sides - it looks like it will provide a larger tunnel exit around the exaust and then feed down from this, but the benefit is that the air outlets on the sidepods can be removed/(reduced?) allowing much better airflow?
Edit: having looked back at previous pics I think I may be imagining this...
I agree. The splited turbo can give a margin of a couple of tenths or half a second, not a couple of seconds.fawe4 wrote:The biggest advantage they have over the others is still their ers-k/h system.
I think they are, hence the pounding round, 89 laps already!gray41 wrote:Will they be running the new PU upgrade?
What PU upgrade??gray41 wrote:Will they be running the new PU upgrade?
New reliability upgrade spec for China.Holm86 wrote:What PU upgrade??gray41 wrote:Will they be running the new PU upgrade?