Even though I strongly tend to agree, I have to admit that the rear of the car strikes me much more in its business and bulkiness. The Butterfly only seems to make this bulkiness worse.trinidefender wrote: I can't help but wonder if they had designed the car with the new nose originally if they would have designed the front of the crash structure higher to have a smooth transition between nose and crash structure.
It might be worth look into shrinking the sidepods in length (higher and shorter with good Coke Bottle seems the better packaging Option since there is no Beam Wing to suffer from high sidepods and the Butterflys don't seem to cut it), and getting rid of the Butterflys and try to go the Merc/RB way. This low sidepod is also an indication they fully relied on the Butterfly solution. Unfortunately it seems that didn't pay off. The big (!) question mark is if there is potential to be discovered in that alley they pursued. Looking at their current Performance I have some doubts.
The front of the car might be a tiny bit sub- Optimum but I seriously doubt it is the real cause of the trouble. At least Nose 2.0 should squeeze plenty of air to the T-Tray/sidepod area.