Of note, Vettel said this on April the 19th. One day before the Chinese Grand prix. He actually said it in the morning, before even qualifying had happened.mnmracer wrote:Again, no one is arguing that Ricciardo had a better race in China.
Of note, Vettel said this on April the 19th. One day before the Chinese Grand prix. He actually said it in the morning, before even qualifying had happened.mnmracer wrote:Again, no one is arguing that Ricciardo had a better race in China.
That does not change the fact that you're saying that all of the reported issues are a lie.turbof1 wrote:Vettel said Ricciardo was beating him fair and square. I'll look for the article. Btw you quoted the wrong person in the post above.mnmracer wrote:Do you have any factual data to support your premise, or is your entire premise based on the assumption that people in the paddock are lying?
No one is saying they're a lie. They're saying they've not been reported the way you think they have.mnmracer wrote:That does not change the fact that you're saying that all of the reported issues are a lie.turbof1 wrote:Vettel said Ricciardo was beating him fair and square. I'll look for the article. Btw you quoted the wrong person in the post above.mnmracer wrote:Do you have any factual data to support your premise, or is your entire premise based on the assumption that people in the paddock are lying?
In China we had a green track come raceday. I believe this is why Lewis was much better than Rosberg and Daniel better than Vettel. The good Setups from Friday were not working on Sunday, while Hamilton never found a setup on Friday and "lucked" into a good setup on Sundayturbof1 wrote:Let's assume for a moment it is true; still doesn't explain the difference between pace and tyre wear in China.
It's probably said in his notebook; I'll get back to you about that. Ted usually is reliable, but I have to see from who he got it, and if it's confirmed or suspected.
Again you're not speaking the truth.beelsebob wrote:No one is saying they're a lie. They're saying they've not been reported the way you think they have.mnmracer wrote:That does not change the fact that you're saying that all of the reported issues are a lie.turbof1 wrote:Vettel said Ricciardo was beating him fair and square. I'll look for the article. Btw you quoted the wrong person in the post above.
Vettel asserted he didn't like the feel of the downshift at Malaysia. That doesn't mean that the gearbox was faulty, or that there was any issue.
But, now that the results have changed, such external obstacles are claimed to be the only reason for the driver's struggles.xxxxxxxx wrote:How does a driver who had his championship fights affected by not-his-fault-retirements more than any other driver "known far more success than failure"? The fact he kept his head cool in late 2010 despite everything that had and kept going wrong, is admirable if anything.
Generally speaking, I think only the deeply devoted can find a way to sit on both sides of the fence like that. It's almost religious in scope, like proselyting to others in order to justify the perpetual exaltation of someone for whom normal rules don't apply.xxxxxxxx wrote:How is it not clear what the issue is?
Australia qualifying & race: power train
Bahrain qualifying: gearbox
Bahrain race: MGU-K harvesting
Nothing unclear about that. All well reported.
Correction: and expect them to find it perfectly acceptable that you are making patently false statements.bhall wrote:Folks, at some point, you just have to learn that you can't have a conversation with certain people about certain drivers. It's like pissing into the wind.
And on that bombshell...beelsebob wrote: Also, this really has very little to do with the Spanish grand prix.
What is it with you and lies? I already said Ted is quite reliable, but we still need to find his source. Being wrong is not the same as lying you know; the world is hardly that black and white.mnmracer wrote:That does not change the fact that you're saying that all of the reported issues are a lie.turbof1 wrote:Vettel said Ricciardo was beating him fair and square. I'll look for the article. Btw you quoted the wrong person in the post above.mnmracer wrote:Do you have any factual data to support your premise, or is your entire premise based on the assumption that people in the paddock are lying?
Haha, I would +1 you if I could.George-Jung wrote:And on that bombshell...beelsebob wrote: Also, this really has very little to do with the Spanish grand prix.
Let's see, you claim that the team told Vettel everything was working, which was untrue.turbof1 wrote:What is it with you and lies?
Even if you can't find a source, based on what do you claim that you know better than Ted?turbof1 wrote:I already said Ted is quite reliable, but we still need to find his source. Being wrong is not the same as lying you know; the world is hardly that black and white.mnmracer wrote:That does not change the fact that you're saying that all of the reported issues are a lie.turbof1 wrote:Vettel said Ricciardo was beating him fair and square. I'll look for the article. Btw you quoted the wrong person in the post above.
I reckon we'll see a similar situation to Malaysia. If Alonso can get ahead of the Red Bulls, it's safe to say he'll stay there with the speed deficit.gray41 wrote:Hard to look past Lewis for this one, I just hope the battle for 3rd is a good one between Alonso, Ricciardo and Vettel.