o.Osmlbstcbr wrote:Well, IF Nico did it on purpose, he would have my approval. He had the guts to do it.
o.Osmlbstcbr wrote:Well, IF Nico did it on purpose, he would have my approval. He had the guts to do it.
I would have always driven there with a Swim Suite. Looking at this picture, if someone makes a mistake there, A Swimming Session seemed complimentary.JimClarkFan wrote:notsofast wrote:Nice pictures on the BBC website from previous F1 races at Monaco.
http://www.bbc.com/news/in-pictures-27526445
the guardian had some nice ones too
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/galler ... x-pictures
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Gua ... hi-019.jpg
personal favourite from the gallery
It did look very odd. .... That said I assume the stewards looked at the data and found everything above board.stefan_ wrote:I can-not-believe how this "Nico did it on purpose" nonsense escalated...
gray41 wrote:LEWIS HAMILTON:
I'd had a good weekend so far and I've just been concentrating on my own performance and working on the pace one step at a time. Qualifying was going well today but in hindsight, I should have nailed my best lap before the end of Q3. This is Monaco and there is always the risk of yellow flags here. Of course, I'm extremely disappointed that I didn't get to finish my lap as I was a couple of tenths up. That's motorsport. I have to get the best possible start and then see what we can do from there.
+--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ |Driver |Sector 1|Sector 2|Sector 3|laptime | +--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ |Nico Rosberg | 19.826| 35.241| 20.922|1’15.989| |Lewis Hamilton| 19.973| 35.140| 20.935|1’16.048| +--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+On his final run, Lewis managed to set a time of 19.906 for Sector 1. That's 0.067 faster than his own personal best - not a couple of tenths and not compared to Rosberg. His Sector 1 time was still slower than Rosberg's previous Sector 1 time. Then again, Lewis was slower in S1, but faster in S2.
He was 2 tenths up on Rosberg's second run at the point Rosberg stuffed it. Also if you multiply 0.067 by three you get.... two tenths.tim|away wrote:gray41 wrote:LEWIS HAMILTON:
I'd had a good weekend so far and I've just been concentrating on my own performance and working on the pace one step at a time. Qualifying was going well today but in hindsight, I should have nailed my best lap before the end of Q3. This is Monaco and there is always the risk of yellow flags here. Of course, I'm extremely disappointed that I didn't get to finish my lap as I was a couple of tenths up. That's motorsport. I have to get the best possible start and then see what we can do from there.+--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ |Driver |Sector 1|Sector 2|Sector 3|laptime | +--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ |Nico Rosberg | 19.826| 35.241| 20.922|1’15.989| |Lewis Hamilton| 19.973| 35.140| 20.935|1’16.048| +--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+On his final run, Lewis managed to set a time of 19.906 for Sector 1. That's 0.067 faster than his own personal best - not a couple of tenths and not compared to Rosberg. His Sector 1 time was still slower than Rosberg's previous Sector 1 time. Then again, Lewis was slower in S1, but faster in S2.
It's quite possible that Lewis could have taken pole position, but it's definitely not as clear-cut as a lot of people make it sound.
Maybe it looked odd because he probably lost the rear end. I don't think he would have taken the risk to play with the steering wheel and maybe lose it completely and damage a car that is well set up for the race.djos wrote:It did look very odd. .... That said I assume the stewards looked at the data and found everything above board.stefan_ wrote:I can-not-believe how this "Nico did it on purpose" nonsense escalated...
They only looked at it from the perspective of the FIA rule book. Locking up isn't illegal, only bringing the sport into disrepute. If there wasn't overwhelming and clear evidence that it was deliberate they couldn't find him guilty of anything even if they wanted to, so their findings aren't unexpected nor enough to satisfy everyone. That said it was better they did make a ruling on this to try and draw a line under it. Had they ignored it completely then the rumours would have continued to escalate.djos wrote:It did look very odd. .... That said I assume the stewards looked at the data and found everything above board.stefan_ wrote:I can-not-believe how this "Nico did it on purpose" nonsense escalated...
Davidson's analysis also highlighted the exact frame at which Rosberg hit the brakes and Herbert pointed out that he was already starting to turn the wheel to react to the rear locking (which Rosberg still hasn't mentioned, only referring to locking the fronts over the bump). Human reaction time is around 160ms which is 4 frames, so even allowing for a super human or predictive reaction Rosberg's a couple of frames ahead of where he should be reacting to the movement of the car. I don't think anyone can state definitively what happened, it's certainly not clear cut and there's enough reason for doubt and enough reason to trust him based on your personal preference and point of view. Let's not vilify each other's opinions in these circumstances.alexx_88 wrote:I think stefan_ summed it up beautifully and it's also an opinion expressed by Anthony Davidson from Sky. Brake much later than usual and just stick the nose into the barrier. No risk of damaging the setup as it's only a nose change.
Doing all those movements with the steering wheel is plain stupid if you want to crash deliberately. Braking intensity is not picked up by the footage and it's much easier for it to go unnoticed to the naked eye of the viewers.
Nice assumption, to multiply by 3. I don't understand that maths well. Whole weekend, Lewis was slower on S1 and S3 and even the last run that he aborted, he was still slower than Pole lap of Nico. There was a comparison that Anthony Davidson was doing on Sky after qualifying, where he compared Lewis' last lap (S1) with that of Nico and it was very clear that there wasn't anything to suggest that lap was going to be mega.myurr wrote:He was 2 tenths up on Rosberg's second run at the point Rosberg stuffed it. Also if you multiply 0.067 by three you get.... two tenths.tim|away wrote:+--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ |Driver |Sector 1|Sector 2|Sector 3|laptime | +--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ |Nico Rosberg | 19.826| 35.241| 20.922|1’15.989| |Lewis Hamilton| 19.973| 35.140| 20.935|1’16.048| +--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+On his final run, Lewis managed to set a time of 19.906 for Sector 1. That's 0.067 faster than his own personal best - not a couple of tenths and not compared to Rosberg. His Sector 1 time was still slower than Rosberg's previous Sector 1 time. Then again, Lewis was slower in S1, but faster in S2.
It's quite possible that Lewis could have taken pole position, but it's definitely not as clear-cut as a lot of people make it sound.