zeph wrote:Chuckjr wrote:
Yea I get it that just raw talent is a beautiful thing to witness and certainly Hamilton meets that expectation, but in today's racing f1 formulae, there's more to the game.
Right. Here we go again. The "Hamilton-is-talented-but-not-smart-or-patient-enough". Not true anymore. That may have been the case earlier in his career, but in recent years he has matured and can bring it home just as well as the next guy.
We should conveniently ignore the fact that he got screwed by RC today.
Sorry for my delayed response. My job sometimes is quite consuming and I can't post as often as I would prefer.
I actually think Lewis is very intelligent. His intelligence is not my argument here whatsoever. All I was stating was that some drivers style is a bit more harsh on the car. That's not criticizing, rather, just their style. I don't think it's just bad luck. I think it also has to do with how the driver goes about being fast. Some, for example, Schumacher, knew how to be very fast but in such a way that it's not as hard on the car. It's an instinct, non-learned trait. Not negative or positive, just a style thing.
IMO, winning the WDC has to do not just with raw talent, but many other contributing factors. These must be considered in the long term for consistent success. That's what I was trying to state in my previous post. I think that's one of the principal reasons some drivers win so many championships. They simply have an ability to go fast while also not being as tough on the car. There's more to it than just driving the nuts off a car.
RC didn't screw Lewis at all. No idea where you got that.
Watching F1 since 1986.