Maldonado had to retire with power unit problems. I think the damage to the C or D aero device (whatever they're called) on the left sidepod happened on lap 1 as it appeared he was hit with debris from Bianchi's car.jz11 wrote:I think I saw in one replay (Marussia incident perhaps) that one Lotus (supposedly Maldo) jumping over kerbs, and later had some sort of bodywork damage (the fin near the side pod entry was loose),AnthonyG wrote:What actually happend to both Lotus cars?
And what caused Raikkonen's spin? That one looked to have a mechanical reason.
Why can't he swerve off the racing line? A driver doesn't need t stay on the racing line if he wants to defend, the only thing that is prohibited is to make an other move after the initial move. clearly this was Perez's initial move and he didn't even steer to the left, he just stopped steering that hard towards the righthand side of the track.beelsebob wrote:And why does that excuse him swerving off the racing line?Dragonfly wrote:Perez had no rear brakes left.
The electric energy is used to enhance the power of the ICE, not be exchange parts of it. The ICE always runs at full pelt while the electric motors kick in whenever charged and needed.jz11 wrote:I'm still curious about how they got that merc to the finish line at similar pace to competitors without running out of fuel while having basically no kinetic energy recovery from braking, they might have still be able to harvest some out of the exhaust via turbocharger (which would imply even higher overall fuel consumption) generator to have at least some juice in the battery to run the internal combustion engine properly - mainly from driveability aspect - maintaining the speed of the turbo ALS wise (which supposedly is done via same electric motor-generator on the turbo) etc, but all in all - ROS should have had real fuel saving problems at the second part of the race
All the MGU-K does is provide 160bhp for 33s every lap. The IC engine + MGU-H work independently of the MGU-K to produce 600bhp. The same amount of fuel is consumed by the IC engine, regardless of the functionality of the MGU-K.jz11 wrote:I'm still curious about how they got that merc to the finish line at similar pace to competitors without running out of fuel while having basically no kinetic energy recovery from braking, they might have still be able to harvest some out of the exhaust via turbocharger (which would imply even higher overall fuel consumption) generator to have at least some juice in the battery to run the internal combustion engine properly - mainly from driveability aspect - maintaining the speed of the turbo ALS wise (which supposedly is done via same electric motor-generator on the turbo) etc, but all in all - ROS should have had real fuel saving problems at the second part of the race
that would be true if mercs would always be 2s faster than the rest on every single lap of the race, which they usually are not, they build the gap and then coast more or less, which means that the recovered kinetic energy still goes into play of the similar lap time to ferrari/renault carsspin1/2 wrote: All the MGU-K does is provide 160bhp for 33s every lap. The IC engine + MGU-H work independently of the MGU-K to produce 600bhp. The same amount of fuel is consumed by the IC engine, regardless of the functionality of the MGU-K.
After losing the MGU-K, Rosberg was 2s a lap slower. That's the effect of an extra 160bhp for 33s on a lap in this circuit.
(For reference, the previous KERS unit which generated 80bhp for 8s, used to make a difference of 0.3-0.5s to the laptimes. )
This race provides a clearer indication of the gap between the Merc AMG and the rest of the pack.
Merc AMG minus MGU-k = RBR or Williams at their best.
That is close to 2s a lap.
The aerial cam confirms exactly what the inboard appointed in first place, Perez steered to the left to block the pass in a desperate last effort to keep some points at bay.Felipe Massa wrote:"Honestly I was the quickest car on the track most of the time,"
"Not with the super-soft, on that tyre I had a similar pace to [team-mate] Valtteri [Bottas], but with the prime the car was amazing - really, really quick - and without this problem in the pitstop I think it was totally possible to be in front of Ricciardo.
"It was a big missed opportunity. We lost a lot of points. We had an incredible car - there were no problems at all.
"I'm so disappointed because it would have been a fantastic race."
"I think the decision was correct to stop,"
"I started to lose grip on the rear, and knowing that normally degradation is not low on our car I'm sure I would have been very slow at the end of the race."
"I wasn't thinking about the victory - I couldn't see the Mercedes very well and I didn't see Lewis retired, so I thought it was a fight for the podium," Massa said.
"They [the team] didn't tell me about the Mercedes problems.
"It was a good track for us so we missed so much, because it was possible to win the race.
"When I was in free air I was the quickest car on the track."
As much as I love Mercedes and as great a drive by Rosberg this was, I think you're overstating your case. Within the realm of Rosberg's bad luck, he was fortunate to have Perez behind him who shielded him from Massa and the Red Bulls. Rosberg was clearly slower than these cars and even Perez could have been quicker despite his ancient tires.spin1/2 wrote:All the MGU-K does is provide 160bhp for 33s every lap. The IC engine + MGU-H work independently of the MGU-K to produce 600bhp. The same amount of fuel is consumed by the IC engine, regardless of the functionality of the MGU-K.jz11 wrote:I'm still curious about how they got that merc to the finish line at similar pace to competitors without running out of fuel while having basically no kinetic energy recovery from braking, they might have still be able to harvest some out of the exhaust via turbocharger (which would imply even higher overall fuel consumption) generator to have at least some juice in the battery to run the internal combustion engine properly - mainly from driveability aspect - maintaining the speed of the turbo ALS wise (which supposedly is done via same electric motor-generator on the turbo) etc, but all in all - ROS should have had real fuel saving problems at the second part of the race
After losing the MGU-K, Rosberg was 2s a lap slower. That's the effect of an extra 160bhp for 33s on a lap in this circuit.
(For reference, the previous KERS unit which generated 80bhp for 8s, used to make a difference of 0.3-0.5s to the laptimes. )
This race provides a clearer indication of the gap between the Merc AMG and the rest of the pack.
Merc AMG minus MGU-k = RBR or Williams at their best.
That is close to 2s a lap.
Not directly at your answer (blame Perez if you want his fault to me too was bigger but it was closer to 50/50 than 100 and I don't want to get into that) but in general:Shrieker wrote: So i was wrong about it. The analysis in the previous page clearly shows Perez moving off racing line in the braking zone. From Massa's on board it looked like he flat ran into Perez.
I agree. Do you also think he was coasting on the straight to save fuel? (along with saving breaks)thomin wrote: As much as I love Mercedes and as great a drive by Rosberg this was, I think you're overstating your case. Within the realm of Rosberg's bad luck, he was fortunate to have Perez behind him who shielded him from Massa and the Red Bulls. Rosberg was clearly slower than these cars and even Perez could have been quicker despite his ancient tires.
As for the MGU-K, it's not just the loss of power that's an issue, but also the loss of rear brake power coupled with the smaller discs.
However, what has become obvious is that the W05 is an all around great piece of machinery and that it's not just the engine. The way Rosberg cranked out these awesome first and second sector times lap after lap speaks volumes.
According to Rosberg it was exactly that, more coasting in order to save the brakes which also led to lower fuel consumption ... and ofc the SC helped a lot with thatkomninosm wrote:I agree. Do you also think he was coasting on the straight to save fuel? (along with saving breaks)thomin wrote: As much as I love Mercedes and as great a drive by Rosberg this was, I think you're overstating your case. Within the realm of Rosberg's bad luck, he was fortunate to have Perez behind him who shielded him from Massa and the Red Bulls. Rosberg was clearly slower than these cars and even Perez could have been quicker despite his ancient tires.
As for the MGU-K, it's not just the loss of power that's an issue, but also the loss of rear brake power coupled with the smaller discs.
However, what has become obvious is that the W05 is an all around great piece of machinery and that it's not just the engine. The way Rosberg cranked out these awesome first and second sector times lap after lap speaks volumes.
Also why did Merc not take countermeasures for failure as they admitted?