I was watching one of the videos of pre-race analysis of 2003 race and it was being mentioned that, this is a race where little over 70% of the time it is full throttle over a lap. Lot of straights, few fast corners and couple of slow ones. So, I guess, it would be medium downforce (particularly for those fast corners). Otherwise, it is a power dominated circuit.Harsha wrote:What kind of Downforce levels teams will run here , Will they run a more DF than Montreal and Bahrain ?
2014 is hell of lot different with 2003 any wayprince wrote:I was watching one of the videos of pre-race analysis of 2003 race and it was being mentioned that, this is a race where little over 70% of the time it is full throttle over a lap. Lot of straights, few fast corners and couple of slow ones. So, I guess, it would be medium downforce (particularly for those fast corners). Otherwise, it is a power dominated circuit.Harsha wrote:What kind of Downforce levels teams will run here , Will they run a more DF than Montreal and Bahrain ?
Probably similar to Bahrain....Harsha wrote:What kind of Downforce levels teams will run here , Will they run a more DF than Montreal and Bahrain ?
Did they change anything at turn 8? Because this destroyed the overtaking opportunity in turn 1 in the past. Somehow like turn 1 in Barcelona.Bomber_Pilot wrote:This is my second favourite race track, right after Spa. There has always been great racing here, since turns 1 and 2 provided great overtaking oportunities.
Most likely similar to Montreal. It could be done with higher downforce, but then the extra drag would have to be overcome on the majority of the track, which means an higher fuel consumption.Harsha wrote:What kind of Downforce levels teams will run here , Will they run a more DF than Montreal and Bahrain ?