Revolutionary? How?WaikeCU wrote:I'm gonna be so pissed if eventually the Bull's end up above the Merc's on Sunday. Mercedes made a revolutionary, dominating car and yet again FIA had to intervene so that the W05 seems more ordinary.
http://184.106.145.74/f1-championship/f ... es_V01.pdfgandharva wrote:RBR looking strong in long runs. Vettel --- up both shots with option tires. Overall Rosberg seems stongest so far, especially on primes.
Pierce89 wrote:Revolutionary? How?WaikeCU wrote:I'm gonna be so pissed if eventually the Bull's end up above the Merc's on Sunday. Mercedes made a revolutionary, dominating car and yet again FIA had to intervene so that the W05 seems more ordinary.
Mercedes is most likely sandbagging not running anywhere near full power.prince wrote:The long run pace is looking odd. Merc, RBR, Williams and Force India, all are doing a start lap of 1:22.6 - 1:22.7 range and ending in 1:23.xxx. Ferrari is doing 1:23.1 start and ending in late 1:23. So, there is something not clear here.
Surely that can't be the way. On the hot laps, almost all cars are going too wide on the last turn reaching start/stop line, whereas Mercs aren't really pushing so much there. It must be said at this point that, ban on FRIC has done some TRICK.
That's what normally happens, people were suggesting RB were close to Merc on race pace in Silverstone but on Sunday the 2nd fastest team was Williams and they were about 2 seconds a lap slower.MercedesAMGSpy wrote:I see some people still didn't learn their lesson, Merc will turn the wick up tomorrow as usual.
That's kinda my point. Calling the W05 revolutionary is as silly as it would be to call thhe rb9 revolutionary. Superiority does not a revolution make.FoxHound wrote:Pierce89 wrote:Revolutionary? How?WaikeCU wrote:I'm gonna be so pissed if eventually the Bull's end up above the Merc's on Sunday. Mercedes made a revolutionary, dominating car and yet again FIA had to intervene so that the W05 seems more ordinary.
I wouldn't say revolutionary, as the tech existed looong before its use in F1.
What Waike is alluding to is the Mercedes set up was inter connected, as per scarbs article.
Whereas others were not as complex apparently.
lolAnon123 wrote:That's what normally happens, people were suggesting RB were close to Merc on race pace in Silverstone but on Sunday the 2nd fastest team was Williams and they were about 2 seconds a lap slower.MercedesAMGSpy wrote:I see some people still didn't learn their lesson, Merc will turn the wick up tomorrow as usual.
10 kph is actually pretty tame compared to some other tracks.SectorOne wrote:I think for the sake of Red Bull, Williams better not start right behind them.
331km/h fastest Williams in speed trap.
321km/h for fastest Red Bull.
10km/h difference when someone is on your a*s is not going to be good.
And they have like 2,5 corners to try and get away from them with two solid straight between the corners.