Thanks for bringing some reasoning and official guidelines/rules into this storm.NTS wrote:Not a Mercedes fan of either side, but I think the pictures of the point ROS hit HAM are a bit misleading. Take a look at where he was going into that corner:
http://oi61.tinypic.com/nwmzcp.jpg
The rules have a definition about being alongside, which is:So I think both could have avoided this accident. ROS by braking when he realized HAM wasn't going to let him stay there, and HAM by not closing the door this hard on a car that is alongside him at a higher speed.For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a 'significant portion'.
But I really don't mind if they keep doing this. Would make the last races of the championship much more exciting to watch if Ricciardo manages to close the points-gap.
Why would one think now about something that might happen in 3 months time?Shrieker wrote:So, what would you guys now think if the double points thingy wins Hamilton the title ?
Maybe Davidson should read the above posted FIA bit of regulation?prince wrote:Please watch Anthony Davidson doing a review of the incident and he clearly showed that Lewis was right on the racing line and to get to overtake through a corner, the chasing car has to be alongside and not keeping the tip of front wing to the rear wheel.NTS wrote:Not a Mercedes fan of either side, but I think the pictures of the point ROS hit HAM are a bit misleading. Take a look at where he was going into that corner:
http://oi61.tinypic.com/nwmzcp.jpg
The rules have a definition about being alongside, which is:So I think both could have avoided this accident. ROS by braking when he realized HAM wasn't going to let him stay there, and HAM by not closing the door this hard on a car that is alongside him at a higher speed.For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a 'significant portion'.
But I really don't mind if they keep doing this. Would make the last races of the championship much more exciting to watch if Ricciardo manages to close the points-gap.
Surprising isn't it? I' mean although I'would be gutted if I were Hamilton, and I would not be sure if I would be capable of delivering such a balanced response as he just did.dans79 wrote:Man, I just watched the YouTube interviews.
Lewis is unhappy but calm and saying all the right things to ingratiate himself.
Laura is visibly annoyed, verging on pissed off.
Wolff is ragingly pissed off. You can see in the interview where he actually catches himself and tries to calm himself down so he doesn't say something he will regret.
If you believe the only people that booed where British, then Yes.SilverArrow10 wrote:Did Nico just insult British fans there??
Totto mentioned something about over revs. I wonder if Nico turned the wick all the way up to maximum and that's how he closed so much ground on Lewis in the first place.Edax wrote: That's why I'm surprised by the veneer, quickness, and absoluteness, in the Mercedes team response. I'm wondering whether we have got the whole story here. Looks to me like this was the straw that broke the camels back, but there is more going on in the background.
Wrong, Davidson on Sky F1 proved Hamilton stayed on the racing line the entire time.cossie wrote:Watched the incident a few times, Hamilton is as much to blame as Nico. Nico held his line, Hamilton shoot to the outside to slam the door and misjudged it.
Did you read the rules and how being alongside is defined?SectorOne wrote:This is a lie.Jano11 wrote:As said before he was alongside Hamilton who just cut over the front wing of his team mate.
Jano11 wrote:The stewards thought different, and I bet they know better.
=D>Jano11 wrote:you might also want to remember that not so long ago the FIA stewards were asked to be more lenient in racing incidents, due to fans complaining. You can't have it both ways, it's as simple as that.