Shooty81 wrote:Honestly, I feel like the stewards should have penalized Nico, especially now with the verbiage of "deliberate" and "proving a point". There wasn't even an investigation, was there?
Only LH said "deliberate". "Proving a point" just means not giving up early. It just doesn't make sense to touch a rear wheel with the front wing deliberately. In most cases this just destroys the front wing.
Who says it has to make sense? Nico has been furious with Lewis since Hungary, and could have let his emotions take over any logic. It's not like he can sit there and weigh the percentages in the middle of a corner. All I'm saying is I think the Stewards should at least have an investigation. If the telemetry doesn't tell them anything more, so be it, but I'm sure it would.
Shooty81 wrote:If the telemetry showed in some way it was done on purpose, they could have sent that data to the FIA so they could have opened an investigation.
I am surprised about all those guys screaming for MGP to punish NR. Why should a team punish their own driver? There won't be any points taken off from Nico, same as there wasn't any action taking points off from Lewis after the Hungarian GP.
They should punish Nico for causing an avoidable incident, ruining Lewis' race, and (most importantly from the team's perspective) disobeying the arrangement made prior to the race. Put in a young reserve driver who can still score some points for the team. Sure, they won't do as well as Nico - call it penance for not having the foresight to prevent the issue in the first place.
Shooty81 wrote:Dangerous precedent to potentially set, but with Nico having admitted guilt and the stewards not having done anything it's kind of an odd-ball situation...
There have been worse crahses being unpunished by the FIA. For example Alonso crashing Vettel in the same race. Just read the comment by Emanuele Pirro.
Or just read
http://www1.skysports.com/f1/report/220 ... nd-bahrain
Or remember LH in Hockenheim.
And there have been much more minor crashes that
have been punished. Let's keep in mind that Nico very likely intentionally caused this, or at the very least declined to avoid it, which is really the same thing in my view. That was not the case for the Alonso-Vettel incident and that kind of behavior is not acceptable in a sport where people are flying around in vehicles going 300+ kph.
Shooty81 wrote:All we hear is one side of the medal. NR is not the kind of guy to play the media card. He decided to keep team internals intern. Don't you think, team responsibles like this kind of behavior?
All you fans of LH, don't forget that the guy who leaves meetings early is LH. The guy who bitches permanently in team radio is LH. I think it is much harder to work with LH than with NR.
What more do you need to know other than the team finds Nico at fault? Even after almost a week of discussion and investigation. And you can leave Lewis' work habits out of the discussion, it's completely irrelevant. You're resorting to ad hominem attacks in the absence of any legitimate arguments.
Shooty81 wrote:Could we please stay a little bit neutral?
Of Course the crash was coused by NR. But it was an racing accident. Those things just happen.
Let's reflect on this again - Nikki Lauda and Toto Wolff, who have all the information, have a responsibility to hear both driver's perspectives (and if anything, ought to be biased toward Nico if you believe Peter Windsor's comments from a few days ago), and have both publicly stated that Nico was at fault and did it "to prove a point". Disciplinary action has been taken against Nico by the team. Yet here you are saying it was a simple racing incident, and you claim
other people are not being neutral? Amazing.