Max Verstappen will drive in FP1 in stead of JEV:
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/29408212
Agree, the focus should be on constructor standings. Caterham seems to have the same problem - focusing on the guy bringing the sponsorship money, not the guy capable of finishing further up the grid.turbof1 wrote:I'm really feeling for the guy. First has to hear he's going to be dropped for someone who -excuse my words- barely got rid of diapers, then does possible the best race of his career in Singapore, only to be rewarded with an FP1 sit-out. Atleast give Kvyat's seat for that; JEV deserves to be treated better and Kvyat still has chances to prove himself.
sorry guys but that's nonsense. If JEV really 'earned' something, he would have had it by now. I remember the craze last year about Daniel getting the RedBull seat over JEV, and look what happens; Daniel pulverises Vettel and JEV has trouble keeping up with a friggin russian Rookie. So now he suddenly does a 'decent drive' because he suddenly wakes up that he's gonna be ditched at the end of the year (something the entire F1 world has been seeing coming from day 1) and now he'll show 'em who's boss to get a seat for next year?kptaylor wrote:Agree, the focus should be on constructor standings. Caterham seems to have the same problem - focusing on the guy bringing the sponsorship money, not the guy capable of finishing further up the grid.turbof1 wrote:I'm really feeling for the guy. First has to hear he's going to be dropped for someone who -excuse my words- barely got rid of diapers, then does possible the best race of his career in Singapore, only to be rewarded with an FP1 sit-out. Atleast give Kvyat's seat for that; JEV deserves to be treated better and Kvyat still has chances to prove himself.
Well, the evidence certainly doesn't support your argument. Yes, he has won some feeder series but this is much the same as every other driver who has managed to get a proper berth (not paid their way) in F1.Manoah2u wrote: NEVER ever has there been a young driver who got this chance, despite there are PLENTY 17 year olds in racing. Therefor, Verstappen stands out and has something and done something to get the attention of Redbull/Toro Rosso.
I guess you must be reading other realities than i do, becuase if anything, everyone around him is impressed about his results, achievements and racecraft which justifies his selection being indeed an extra-ordinary talent. And because of this extra-ordinary talent which his companion 17-year olds have not achieved, he stands out. He stands out because his results, telemetry and racecraft upon research by people who investigate and can value this data realise this 17 year old far exceeds the expectations they have of much older 'rookies'. In other words, they have decided he has more potential than 19 and 20 year old racers whom have been through many other series.Fulcrum wrote:Well, the evidence certainly doesn't support your argument. Yes, he has won some feeder series but this is much the same as every other driver who has managed to get a proper berth (not paid their way) in F1.Manoah2u wrote: NEVER ever has there been a young driver who got this chance, despite there are PLENTY 17 year olds in racing. Therefor, Verstappen stands out and has something and done something to get the attention of Redbull/Toro Rosso.
Somehow you are conflating the fact that he is 17 and has been selected with him being an extra-ordinary talent. At this point the only thing that is unusual is his selection, which a lot of people are rightly unimpressed with.
He barely has results. He has done, up until now, 9 events in the open wheel series. Not in the higher tiers, but in the openings series Formula 3. Yes agreed: he has made a big impression there, but it's still something different then F1.I guess you must be reading other realities than i do, becuase if anything, everyone around him is impressed about his results, achievements and racecraft which justifies his selection being indeed an extra-ordinary talent. And because of this extra-ordinary talent which his companion 17-year olds have not achieved, he stands out. He stands out because his results, telemetry and racecraft upon research by people who investigate and can value this data realise this 17 year old far exceeds the expectations they have of much older 'rookies'. In other words, they have decided he has more potential than 19 and 20 year old racers whom have been through many other series.
I can agree with that. Still, as a spectator I feel pity for the guy, but no need to continue on it.hollus wrote:Well, Marko has often said that Toro Rosso is not there to let good racers race, not even very good ones. They are only interested in a future world champion, since they have a current one. And the second it looks like you are not WC material you are out. It is brutal, but at least it is done openly. Respect or gratitude debts do not come into it. He won't be around much longer, so it doesn't matter if he misses FP1. Indeed.
What?Manoah2u wrote:sorry guys but that's nonsense. If JEV really 'earned' something, he would have had it by now. I remember the craze last year about Daniel getting the RedBull seat over JEV, and look what happens; Daniel pulverises Vettel and JEV has trouble keeping up with a friggin russian Rookie.
It's no good having the faster driver if you don't have enough cash to develop next year's car or finish the season.kptaylor wrote:Agree, the focus should be on constructor standings. Caterham seems to have the same problem - focusing on the guy bringing the sponsorship money, not the guy capable of finishing further up the grid.
He has beaten 31y old karting drivers and former F1 drivers in different categories. After karting he didn't go to the easy option FR2.0, but chose the stronger F3 series, beating guys with much more experience in his rookie season. Verstappen and Ocon are special drivers and they will impress the formula one world sooner rather than later.turbof1 wrote:He barely has results. He has done, up until now, 9 events in the open wheel series. Not in the higher tiers, but in the openings series Formula 3. Yes agreed: he has made a big impression there, but it's still something different then F1.I guess you must be reading other realities than i do, becuase if anything, everyone around him is impressed about his results, achievements and racecraft which justifies his selection being indeed an extra-ordinary talent. And because of this extra-ordinary talent which his companion 17-year olds have not achieved, he stands out. He stands out because his results, telemetry and racecraft upon research by people who investigate and can value this data realise this 17 year old far exceeds the expectations they have of much older 'rookies'. In other words, they have decided he has more potential than 19 and 20 year old racers whom have been through many other series.
About JEV earning something: you know as good as I do that Torro Rosso is a junior development team. It's not matter of earning it, but a matter of racing 3 years for the team, see if there's a spot free at the senior red bull team and if not you get automatically the boot.
The issue I'm having most of all is that he is a capable driver, and it's disrespectful now to give his FP1 seat to Max. It comes across like "well, you won't be around much longer anyway so what does it matter that you are going to miss FP1.". That's F1, yes, and more often then not ethics have to make room for this kind of practices unfortunaly.
You might not remember him after this, but I think I will, as the guy having more bad luck then what not. I do hope he finds somewhere a decent seat next year in F1.
It's no good being in f1 if you don't have the cash.....richard_leeds wrote:It's no good having the faster driver if you don't have enough cash to develop next year's car or finish the season.kptaylor wrote:Agree, the focus should be on constructor standings. Caterham seems to have the same problem - focusing on the guy bringing the sponsorship money, not the guy capable of finishing further up the grid.
Everyone around him happens to have a vested interest in him, namely: his father, his manager, Red Bull, his current F3 team. None of these sources can be considered objective or unbiased for fairly obvious reasons.Manoah2u wrote:I guess you must be reading other realities than i do, becuase if anything, everyone around him is impressed about his results, achievements and racecraft which justifies his selection being indeed an extra-ordinary talent. And because of this extra-ordinary talent which his companion 17-year olds have not achieved, he stands out. He stands out because his results, telemetry and racecraft upon research by people who investigate and can value this data realise this 17 year old far exceeds the expectations they have of much older 'rookies'. In other words, they have decided he has more potential than 19 and 20 year old racers whom have been through many other series.Fulcrum wrote:Well, the evidence certainly doesn't support your argument. Yes, he has won some feeder series but this is much the same as every other driver who has managed to get a proper berth (not paid their way) in F1.Manoah2u wrote: NEVER ever has there been a young driver who got this chance, despite there are PLENTY 17 year olds in racing. Therefor, Verstappen stands out and has something and done something to get the attention of Redbull/Toro Rosso.
Somehow you are conflating the fact that he is 17 and has been selected with him being an extra-ordinary talent. At this point the only thing that is unusual is his selection, which a lot of people are rightly unimpressed with.
There is no way a highly critical man like Helmut Marko would ever put somebody in a F1 seat over somebody else if he genuinly did not have the evidence to support this 'wild' decision.
Yes, vitantonio liuzzi won some feeder series. so did pastor maldonado. somehow they are or have been in F1.
If you look at the clumsy and dangerous errors made by Pastor then you really start wondering the actual use and benefit
of current 'feeder' series. So again, why would a driver need to go through some useless years at boring series that add nothing but a tiny bit of more experience, and waste some years and in the end never get a seat?