https://twitter.com/adamcooperF1/status ... 1848641536
mp4/29H The mclaren test f1 car for honda by Ron Dennis.......that a serious work from mclaren and honda...for 2015
Classic Ron Dennis, he's as good as Bernie at saying nothing. It could be mediocre without question for all we know.Ron Dennis wrote:"The competiveness of the engine is without question.”
Since it's such a good question, I've written the DMSB (German Motor Sport Club) for an explanation, since the FiA doesn't answer technical questions themselves - I now feel more confident that we'll get a correct answerbhall II wrote:From 2014 to 2015, as written in the regulations, 8% of the PU will be frozen (cylinder bore spacing, deck height, bank stagger, crank throw, main bearing journal diameter, rod bearing journal diameter, pneumatic valvetrain compressor/pressure regulation devices), and half of the remaining 92% can be modified, or 48% of the total PU. From 2015 to 2016, 23% of the PU will be frozen (everything listed above and a shitload of other stuff), and half of the remaining 77% can be modified: or 38% of the total PU.
My question is this: will Honda be obliged to follow the update schedule exactly as written, which ties updates to calendar years, or will their delayed entry be taken into account? In other words, will they be forced to bypass the initial 48% update entirely, because the 2016 rules only allow for a 38% update, or will they be allowed to make a 48% update on account of it being their first update?
It's a convoluted question; I hope it makes sense.
I don't think you should take promo-stuff like this too serious moderator, surely the engine will not even look like that.Richard wrote: ...
ps - That engine doesn't sound like the current engines, we can't hear the turbo or ERS.
Talk about going above and beyond... =D>CBeck113 wrote:Since it's such a good question, I've written the DMSB (German Motor Sport Club) for an explanation, since the FiA doesn't answer technical questions themselves - I now feel more confident that we'll get a correct answer
[...]
c) would be Honda, and therefore they will have to follow the update schedule just like all the others. They will have had to nail the design, or hope that their mistakes lead to failures to be able to make updates.
...especially if they're benchmarking their engine to what will be an obsolete design next year.BBC wrote:Insiders say the Japanese turbo hybrid is showing strong performance on the test bed at the Honda factory, and the company has the advantage of knowing the performance of the current Mercedes engine and therefore what it has to aim for with its design.