a perfect example of how winning championships is used to sell cars is this Inifiniti Commercial.
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7M4f/infiniti-in ... ian-vettel
Infinity ? are you sure this is a good example? As far as I´m informed these cars do not sell well at all Vettel winning or not .dans79 wrote:a perfect example of how winning championships is used to sell cars is this Inifiniti Commercial.
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7M4f/infiniti-in ... ian-vettel
Forget "markeing", that's just a xcuse to spend a long weekend with MrE's hospitality, including champagne and half naked ladies.GitanesBlondes wrote: ...
I'd love to know how the shareholders sit by and watch this type of money being pissed away with no benefit to be had.
...
''These two Austrians'' are Mercedes shareholders and will do everything to make the F1 project a huge success. Mercedes have a big budget to spend, sponsoring the German football team, DTM etc. Why would they sponsor the German football team? Why would they invest in a F1 team? Well, they have the money to do so and every time the name Mercedes is mentioned, they will be satisfied.GitanesBlondes wrote:Split from the engine unfreeze debate.
Just when we thought it was safe because Brawn had left Zetchse then let two Austrians run the team ....
_________________________________________________
There is no real world benefit to spending half a billion USD on a Formula 1 program.
I'd love to know how the shareholders sit by and watch this type of money being pissed away with no benefit to be had.
Sure they will dress it up as a marketing exercise, but this doesn't make me want to run out and buy a Mercedes since what they do in F1 has no real world relevance...not even a supposed "road relevant" V6 hybrid engine has any meaning. I never watched F1 for road relevance. I watched it because it was about outrageous engines, and outrageous cars.
I also do wonder why Zetchse is letting two Austrians run the team.
how effective the add campaign is is definitely in question. My point was look what they are doing. They are simply implying that since Vettel is a four time world champion that effects the quality of their cars.marcush. wrote:Infinity ? are you sure this is a good example? As far as I´m informed these cars do not sell well at all Vettel winning or not .dans79 wrote:a perfect example of how winning championships is used to sell cars is this Inifiniti Commercial.
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7M4f/infiniti-in ... ian-vettel
You should be looking at their sales pre-RBR sponsorship and post sponsorship.marcush. wrote:Infinity ? are you sure this is a good example? As far as I´m informed these cars do not sell well at all Vettel winning or not .dans79 wrote:a perfect example of how winning championships is used to sell cars is this Inifiniti Commercial.
http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7M4f/infiniti-in ... ian-vettel
They quit because they couldn't justify the expenditures no matter what happened. No board or shareholders were going to stand for hundreds of millions of dollars going down the drain with little conceivable benefit.kooleracer wrote: When you spend a lot of money and you don't have success, of course you are going to quit. Manufacturers profit form the exposure when they become world champion, the run tons of ads and flaunt with the fact they have one the world champion. Keep your eye on the upcoming Mercedes ads, or ads form their sponsors.
Incorrect.You can't hold Mercedes accountable for the actions of Mr.E, Ecclestone was on trail not Mercedes. So that argument doesn't hold up. And Mr.E hasn't been formally jailed for bribing, because he won the case ( bought off, you say potato, I say potato). So they haven't broke their core values by still being in F1.
So erm, yeah you want to try that again?As a company that does business worldwide, we at Daimler have a global responsibility. As a result, we have committed ourselves to the principles of the United Nations Global Compact.
We place special emphasis on the following principles:
– Protection of human rights
– Protection of fundamental rights at work, in particular the freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining, the elimination of discrimination before and during employment and the rejection of forced labour and child labour
– Sustained environmental protection
– Fight against corruption.
We are working to ensure that our company, as well as our business partners and customers, follow these principles. Furthermore, we comply with international and local laws and provisions. Together, we ensure that everyone in the Daimler Group obeys the laws and regulations that apply to our work.
Closed wheel, closed cockpit prototypes make it more relevant. I don't know anyone who drives around an open cabin --convertibles not withstanding-- open wheel road cars. They also allowed for more approaches to be used with regards to engine design, something F1 did not do because they were too busy pretending to be concerned about reduced costs, and they forced a near spec engine design on everyone save for a loophole regarding split turbos.LMP1-H does have more road relevance simply because of what the regulations are, which regulations makes LMP1-H more relevant according to you?
or so... with 700 employees of top catgory you will not even pay their wages with that sort of moneys...Sure they have Sponsorship ..but you believe blackberry (who has bought a blackberry recently???) Petronas is reported to pay 30mill € per year as title sponsors...with reported 500mill€spent this year the canyon we are trying to bridge is a bit deeper than your 63mill € ....if I´m not mistaken ...even RedBulls Mateschitz let Vettel go without even hesitating ..a 4 times championrscsr wrote:All in all, F1 cost Mercedes "just" 63 000 000€ or so in 2013. I have no idea how much it will be this season, but I doubt that it will be higher at all. Doesn't sound too bad for a constructors and drivers title in F1.
It doesn't prove anything because Mercedes had prestige long before their F1 involvement.dans79 wrote:
You just proved my point, owning the car manufactured by the world champions is a form of Prestige.
You do realize you just argued against yourself there...right?Again, you are giving way to much credit to the average car buyer.
For example, customers who stated that their auto dealer sales and service reps were "extremely helpful" were, on average, 11 times more likely to have passion for their cars. And in another study, we found that owners of Toyotas and Hondas, both of which are highly rated for their vehicle quality, were 10 to 15 times more disposed to repurchase those vehicle brands if they felt that their dealers provided outstanding customer service. Brand passion depends on more than just functional attributes
Customers aren't just "touched" by the quality and price of the vehicle or by the informational content of its advertising. Their perceptions are formed -- and their emotions are engaged -- by their experiences while their car is in the service bay, the treatment they receive during the financing process, the appreciative stares of their neighbors, and the time they spend on hold waiting to talk to a customer service representative. Those are the moments that enhance or endanger brand relationships.
Well, I have a limit to my patience, and will only tolerate so much from someone who is arguing just for the sake of it.marcush. wrote:.dans79 wrote:whatever, I should have just listened to the modes when they warned me about you!
I would prefer not to read something like this .If anything you´would have earned yourself a ban for this .Others have been for less .