The strategist are only a factor if something goes wrong; in a 1-2 case both drivers follow the exact same strategy. So there's very little competition between the strategists.prince wrote:We have seen Nico doing it in Sochi, which is a very similar track to Abu Dhabi, albeit with glorious tyre advantage in Sochi. This is a long race and with Soft and SuperSoft, there would be lot of pit stops and would create more optimized stint opportunities. In Singapore, Lewis did a phenomenal stint to get a Pit window created. Seb did that come back with RB9, with much lesser performance margin compared to W05.WaikeCU wrote:If Vettel can do a comeback drive on this track, I'm sure Hamilton would be able to do that too. Even more with such a dominant car.CHT wrote:I dont see anything chance of a non Merc finishing 2nd if LH has got a reliable car, so the only way NR can win the championship is if LH DNF or some freak SC period that mess up LH pit stop.
This is any a high downforce circuit, but I expect both cars to be set up predominantly biased towards Race setup mode and if that happens, then the qualifying margins would be very narrow between Merc and other teams.
Merc engineers would have been working days and nights to ensure reliability and the race planning team is trying to put together all possible plans in case for adversity. As much as it is between the drivers, it would be same with engineers and strategists.
I personally think that all resources have been allocated on checking the cars over and over again. The last thing Mercedes wants right now, is a driver championship spoiled because one of their cars broke down.