I wonder if that is it for F1 in US? The '05 race really killed F1 in that country, and I doubt that Bernie will ever be able to dig himself out of that mess. Also, it is becoming obvious that there are many emerging markets which are dying to host an F1 race, which means that Bernie will still get his fees and maintain the same number of races, even if US never hosts a GP again. India with its population of 1 billion, seems like a better market than US' 300 million. So, I think that Bernie had given up on the US.checkered wrote:
Well, hopefully we'll be spared of flying beverages this time!Bernie hasn't exactly been on a charm offensive either ... he's sent a letter to India, telling the folks there that IF they'll have a purpose built race track set up in time for a GP at an indeterminate date during 2009, he'll grant them one. That's a pretty big if as far as I'm concerned - but comes in handy when making statements such as the races in Indy (or US for that matter) not being "vital" for F1. How, exactly - vital like a hart, lungs or a brain perhaps? I seriously doubt Ecclestone could've used a lesser word for all his worldly ambitions to be realized ...
I remember reading an article a few months back that talked about the big spike in car sales in India. What better place to promote your vehicles than to bring F1 to that country (well, OK, there are better ways, but you guys get the point).