Most every bike rider knows that spatial awareness - ( an ability - likely inherited from our tree-dwelling forebears),
is a needful survival skill, (& makes you a better car driver too..)
Yes you are right. It was just at that moment, I realised I will never be a racing driver. Bringing a car close to it's capabilities and driving quite fast on a given track, maybe I am better than average. But definitely lacking those other abilities you need not to only drive a car fast, but race it. The first chapters in Jenkinsons book cover that topic really well. I found myself quite often in his words.autogyro wrote:A lot more to it than even that Felix.
A race driver must also be able to conserve tyres and fuel if it is in a formula like F1.
Simply learning the maximum capability of the car in a short time and using it is just the beginning.
The driver must also be capable of driving using advice from the pits and learn how to nurse the car home if needed.
I am very interested in how spatial awareness affects how well a combat aircraft operates as compared to an F1 car etc.J.A.W. wrote:Well r-r, you need to know that 'spatial awareness' is a dynamic process,
& that includes the ability to judge the probable outcomes of stimulus inputs..
Training/experiential feedback can make this response feel reflexive.. ..pre-conscious.. to the adept..
Interesting, I did similar training years ago.trinidefender wrote:Concerning fighter pilots and many pilots in general (almost all helicopter pilots do it) we have to go through what is known as unusual attitude training. This is where the instructor will tell you to close your eyes and put the aircraft or full motion simulator in various climbs, dives, turns, loops or what have you and then tell you to open your eyes and you you are expected to recover the aircraft to straight and level flight at a certain altitude, speed and heading. Oddly enough this has very little to do with spatial awareness. With no outside visual references you brain isn't very good at figuring out which way is up or down etc and is quite a weird feeling. You are taught/trained to ignore what your body is telling you and to look at your instruments (attitude indicator - this tells you what pitch and roll the aircraft is in, your vertical speed indicator, your airspeed indicator, compass/directional gyro and finally what power settings you are currently using). This doesn't directly pertain to F1 but gives a small insight into the world of disorientation and recovery from it.
I would caution you to be careful about the French Airbus crash. The crash was not caused by disorientation but rather by lack of aircraft knowledge and/or insufficient training on that aircraft type. The airbus flight control computers are not supposed to allow the aircraft to stall in normal operation however in certain circumstances the computers can go into modes where the pilot has more direct control over what the aircraft is doing and has no stall protection built in. It was noted that the first officer kept a pitch up control input in his side stick control which the captain did not realise until it was to late.J.A.W. wrote:The brain allows for overlapping sensory inputs,
& under blind flying conditions trusting instrumentation has shown its value.
The tragic case of the French Airbus crash into the Atlantic where the pilot was wrongly battling
the computerised automatic control safety over-rides is a case in point.
However, the visual field, whereby correctly predicting likely manoeuvres & effectively countering them,
via expert control inputs - is what sorts the aces from the also rans..
"Natural" vs "learned" applied ability - is another matter..