WilliamsF1 wrote:Pierce89 wrote:J.A.W. wrote:A-125..
How can you possibly make the call - on what anyone else but yourself - finds boring?
As I noted, my last dirt bike was a KTM 380 2T, & so no, aint no 4T 450 gonna impress me much, power-wise..
Here's an example of the kind of fun a bigger cc 2T provides..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxqPMR9MCx4
I did take the opportunity to have a ride on a 250 4T yesterday though, & it was - IMO - most def' "boring"..
JAW. Unless your KTM 380 2t is highly tuned, it has less peak power than any of the full face 450s, as current MX 450s make close to 60hp at the rear wheel. A KTM 380 2t is an off-road bike with a much less aggressive engine than an MX bike.
A KTM 250 2t is 50hp off the showroom
The scale is not proportional I´m afraid, or 500 2t should be around 100hp when they around 60 as much
What I mean is from 250 category bigger engines do not increase peak power at same scale, their power band is wider, flatter and more powerfull at low revs, but peak power does not increase that much
So peak power is similar, and as Pierce said, that 380 is an enduro bike, not an MX bike, and enduro bikes are a bit less powerfull than MX ones, with a softer response to improve traction and easy of use, longer gearshifts... Moreover, usual enduro bikes use MX engines adapted to enduro, but the 380 was born as an enduro bike, so its engine was not built trying to reach highest possible peak power, but ease of use probably, wich means flatter powerband instead of high peak power.
Only problem is some people is obsessed criticizing 4t´s, but I´d bet a salary that 380 does not have one single horse power more than 450 mx bikes.... and I´ll ignore 450s apply its power a lot more efficiently to the ground what means they will accelerate way faster to that old 380.