but after Sauber C32 we should know that tight sidepods are overrated...f1rules wrote:im sorry, but look at the comparison pics, rb dont have the tigthest sidepods anymore
but after Sauber C32 we should know that tight sidepods are overrated...f1rules wrote:im sorry, but look at the comparison pics, rb dont have the tigthest sidepods anymore
OLED would make sense as they are half the thickness of LCD due to not needing a backlight. A WRGB OLED display should be able to produce similar brightness levels too.zztopless wrote: I'm pretty sure all teams using the new display were using OLED panels last year - http://www.mercedesamgf1.com/en/news/20 ... ing-wheel/ . I imagine the product they sell to the public needs to be in the realms of affordability (relative to F1 parts anyway), whereas for F1, you where weight is king - you would think OLED wins out. Given the screens seem to be mostly used for displaying white/light coloured text and graphics on a black/dark background, inherent contrast advantage of OLED would be well suited to being as easy to read as possible.
Having said that, LCD is of course more than capable and perhaps the extra weight isn't an issue for some teams (although given negligible difference in cost, in the context of a team's budget and the fact that it's going to be a bespoke part either way, I don't see why you wouldn't go for the slimmer, lighter easier to read screen).
Actually no I think they've brought the cooling exits up higher to better allow for airflow around the side pods undercut and over the top of the diffuser.George-Jung wrote: The exhaust also seems to exit way lower than the 2014 Red Bull...
Yep, WRGB overcomes one of the relative weaknesses to LCD, white efficiency and brightness (although brightness isn't really an issue with OLED panels anymore (they tend to be brighter than LCDs), even when displaying white. But it's the weight and space savings, as you say, that make it a perfect fit for F1.djos wrote:OLED would make sense as they are half the thickness of LCD due to not needing a backlight. A WRGB OLED display should be able to produce similar brightness levels too.zztopless wrote: I'm pretty sure all teams using the new display were using OLED panels last year - http://www.mercedesamgf1.com/en/news/20 ... ing-wheel/ . I imagine the product they sell to the public needs to be in the realms of affordability (relative to F1 parts anyway), whereas for F1, you where weight is king - you would think OLED wins out. Given the screens seem to be mostly used for displaying white/light coloured text and graphics on a black/dark background, inherent contrast advantage of OLED would be well suited to being as easy to read as possible.
Having said that, LCD is of course more than capable and perhaps the extra weight isn't an issue for some teams (although given negligible difference in cost, in the context of a team's budget and the fact that it's going to be a bespoke part either way, I don't see why you wouldn't go for the slimmer, lighter easier to read screen).
OLED's being self-emissive pixels also have the advantage of using less power than a backlit LCD as only the active pixels use any power (vs an always on backlight array across the entire panel).zztopless wrote:Yep, WRGB overcomes one of the relative weaknesses to LCD, white efficiency and brightness (although brightness isn't really an issue with OLED panels anymore (they tend to be brighter than LCDs), even when displaying white. But it's the weight and space savings, as you say, that make it a perfect fit for F1.djos wrote: OLED would make sense as they are half the thickness of LCD due to not needing a backlight. A WRGB OLED display should be able to produce similar brightness levels too.
I kind of disagreef1rules wrote:im sorry, but look at the comparison pics, rb dont have the tigthest sidepods anymore
Yes, I agree but maybe all this won't be enough. Renault seems to really have improved on power and being more compact but what I take from Newey's words is that they will fight for wins on places where HP is not so determinant and that's it. Not an overall contender, still.Diesel wrote: The undercut and size of the sidepod intakes is particularly impressive, and the packaging at the rear is probably the tightest of what we've seen so far, Mclaren are not far behind in this area.
Tom Clarkson @TomClarksonF1
Adrian Newey: "Good first day. The car is a decent step forward, but it'll be difficult to mount a serious title challenge"
What rule do you think banned it?Rikhart wrote:Wasnt this sort of s-duct banned?
Not as much at the rear, but the front of the sidepods have a deep undercut, and the intakes are very small.f1rules wrote:im sorry, but look at the comparison pics, rb dont have the tigthest sidepods anymore
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!