This Flying bird under the nose of the merc seems powerfull, lets call it angry bird !
The next question, is how does it improve the car?chuckdanny wrote:This Flying bird under the nose of the merc seems powerfull, lets call it angry bird !
For me, it "obviously" can't seal the under floor. It's rotating the wrong way to do that. This would actually draw air out from under the floor, not force it to stay under there.chuckdanny wrote:Well, first it's not new, the also called bat wing was there with the W05 while not at every grand prix.
They are many theories about the use of vortices. Some claim it seal the underfloor, it improves the speed carried through the bottom of the sidepod by the stream under the nose and maybe burst right in the coke bottle shape area behind the sidepod at the very top speed where maybe the flow is detaching creating drag.
I think it's vortices help at the outer edges of the floor to create a stronger seal. It's in a similar area to where the vortices shed by the front wing are going.dans79 wrote:The next question, is how does it improve the car?chuckdanny wrote:This Flying bird under the nose of the merc seems powerfull, lets call it angry bird !
If you read my previous post, you'll see that this isn't what's happening - the vortices are rotating the wrong way to seal the floor.wesley123 wrote:I think it's vortices help at the outer edges of the floor to create a stronger seal. It's in a similar area to where the vortices shed by the front wing are going.dans79 wrote:The next question, is how does it improve the car?chuckdanny wrote:This Flying bird under the nose of the merc seems powerfull, lets call it angry bird !
Yes, i knew there would be confusion there, of course not this one, i was talking about vortices and there different uses.Moose wrote:For me, it "obviously" can't seal the under floor. It's rotating the wrong way to do that. This would actually draw air out from under the floor, not force it to stay under there.chuckdanny wrote:Well, first it's not new, the also called bat wing was there with the W05 while not at every grand prix.
They are many theories about the use of vortices. Some claim it seal the underfloor, it improves the speed carried through the bottom of the sidepod by the stream under the nose and maybe burst right in the coke bottle shape area behind the sidepod at the very top speed where maybe the flow is detaching creating drag.
Perhaps you should explain how/why rather than just stating a "fact". Explain/show why their rotation is wrong for the task suggested.Moose wrote:If you read my previous post, you'll see that this isn't what's happening - the vortices are rotating the wrong way to seal the floor.wesley123 wrote:I think it's vortices help at the outer edges of the floor to create a stronger seal. It's in a similar area to where the vortices shed by the front wing are going.dans79 wrote:
The next question, is how does it improve the car?
You've got things muddled up in your head. Underneath the floor there is a low pressure as a result of the very low T-tray and the rake that all F1 cars run nowadays. This means that as air flows backwards underneath the floor it has to expand to fill the expanding space. As the airflow expands the pressure drops. This pressure drop means that airflow from the edge (sides) of the floor wants to flow underneath it. If air is allowed to flow in from the sides then it means less expansion of air, a higher pressure under the floor and ergo, less downforce created by the floor.Moose wrote:For me, it "obviously" can't seal the under floor. It's rotating the wrong way to do that. This would actually draw air out from under the floor, not force it to stay under there.chuckdanny wrote:Well, first it's not new, the also called bat wing was there with the W05 while not at every grand prix.
They are many theories about the use of vortices. Some claim it seal the underfloor, it improves the speed carried through the bottom of the sidepod by the stream under the nose and maybe burst right in the coke bottle shape area behind the sidepod at the very top speed where maybe the flow is detaching creating drag.
Well, this bit is just plain wrong.trinidefender wrote:This means that as air flows backwards underneath the floor it has to expand to fill the expanding space. As the airflow expands the pressure drops.
Why would the airflow slow down? It has to fill a constantly expanding space therefore it actually has to speed up. A floor with rake works in the same way that a diffuser works. If what you say is right then a diffuser would see high pressure but it doesn't.timbo wrote:Well, this bit is just plain wrong.trinidefender wrote:This means that as air flows backwards underneath the floor it has to expand to fill the expanding space. As the airflow expands the pressure drops.
The expansion actually slows the flow and raises the (static) pressure.
It's the simple conservation of mass that proves this fact, Q1 = Q2 (no mass accumulated or lost) on two section of a flow tube of different diameter means v1S1 = v2S2 where S1< S2 (that is volume in = volume out, incompressible flow) means v1>v2. Now you still have to find the right tube which in a turbulent flow is what is looked for and never found but lets think about an enjoyable laminar flow.trinidefender wrote:Why would the airflow slow down? It has to fill a constantly expanding space therefore it actually has to speed up. A floor with rake works in the same way that a diffuser works. If what you say is right then a diffuser would see high pressure but it doesn't.timbo wrote:Well, this bit is just plain wrong.trinidefender wrote:This means that as air flows backwards underneath the floor it has to expand to fill the expanding space. As the airflow expands the pressure drops.
The expansion actually slows the flow and raises the (static) pressure.
It does see higher pressure, it's higher pressure than the rest of the floor that is feeding it, the purpose of the diffuser is to allow lower pressures and higher airspeeds under the floor by providing recovery back to free stream pressure. That's why powerful diffuser and floor setups generate downforce gains both front and rear. If it was just the diffuser generating low pressure you'd have to balance it out with a skinny rear wing and a massive front.trinidefender wrote: Why would the airflow slow down? It has to fill a constantly expanding space therefore it actually has to speed up. A floor with rake works in the same way that a diffuser works. If what you say is right then a diffuser would see high pressure but it doesn't.